this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
329 points (96.3% liked)
Shitty Food Porn
3201 readers
5 users here now
This community is for shitty pictures of food and pictures of shitty food.
For pictures of good food, check out !foodporn@lemmy.world
Related Communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
whats wrong soldier boys, don't like what uncle sam is serving you? maybe they should have made better choices when voting.
Can you expand upon this?
Soldier boys (men and women)
They (all of the people currently in the military? )
All voted for politicians who are in offices now?
Please explain
Enough of them did, and even more have joined-up recently-enough to know exactly who they would be taking orders from. Your argument doesn't hold water.
Incorrect My argument was asking for more information and the commenter has yet to make reply.
Iv not replyed because your not worth replying to, everyone else here understands what I'm saying but you, sounds like a you problem. Enough voted on it and now they're stuck with that they've got wanted, now it's time to own it. Don't like it then I suggest you don't reup jarhead.
Popular agreement does not equate to correctness.
You did reply. 'Not worth replying to' - parroting the others, riding the popularity...
'Jarhead' is a word-it does not apply to me. Using inciteful words you do not understand or rather do not understand the intended target (me) whom you've not taken one ounce of effort to understand
While
Making a simple, short, low effort claim, I see this and I want more information to understand your positions more clearly.
You, on the other hand, could not care less about what my position is even though I am in a place to understand this issue on a more intimate level...
Group X v Group Y The less those two groups attempt to understand eachother the more likely chaos, division, hatred, and or violence is to occur.
See this is why i didn't respond to you initially, your just doing that stupid redditer pseudo intellectual rutine, trying to use logic on a offhand observation that wasn't anything more then a jab at the American military complex. I insult them because they're a v. clearly an imperialist body and if your too dumb to realize that then Im not going to waste my breath on you, america has been made fun of for being oil hungry meddlers for decades.
you stupidly singled stuff out like 'solider boys' as if it was a gotcha. as Machinefab812 pointed that out, many voted for them just shy of 50% and now this is what they have to look forward to, you going 'who, what, way' like a child will get you about as far as a child and i really don't think i need to add any more to this convo cuz its a waste of time.
'Trying to use logic' Thinking
Could have said that from the beginning. Im not attacking anyone or being a child because I am in fact an adult. When someone asks for clarification typically there is a response-this is how communication generally happens between adults.
Like this 'What did you mean by that?' ' I meant this.' 'OK. Because I thought you meant this, great.'
So no, I do not see why you delayed a response because it could have been far less dialogue had you said 'its not that deep bro, I just dislike this thing happening and I didn't think too muchh about what I typed'
Again with the popularity thing?
'Soldier boy' singled out because you used the term incorrectly showing a lack of understanding (thats OK Im here to help-- I do understand, you just have to set aside some ego)
'Jarhead' singled out because it was used incorrectly showing a lack of understanding again.
No, you do not need to do anything. I can see you lack the positive spirit of truth seeking, accountability and international cooperation and I cannot help that.
No specific commenter is obligated to reply to your non-sense or do your research for you. "Enough of them did" was more info than your "request" merritts.
Asking to put up or shut up is a fair request. They aren't obligated to respond to that request, but it's equally fair to then assume their statement is rectally sourced.
Imagine doing fuck-all to prove me wrong, not even bothering to make a counter-claim, then referring to my, TRUE, statement as "rectally sourced".
Maybe I didn't have to look it up immediately before commenting, because I've looked it up many, many, times before when bothering such obligatory things as "you are wrong, and this is why."
See what I did there?
Good job doubling-down on a double-down. I'll go up and add that link to my earlier comment, so no one need dig down here to see your laziness and shame, which to spell it out again: you made zero claims(beyond "rectally sourced", yawnwithatootforya*), and provided nothing in the way of substantiating your ignorant bullshit.
The suggestion that the person making the claim is responsible for substantiating that claim made you throw a tantrum. If you're that fragile, maybe the Internet isn't the place for you.
The internet is no more the place for those who need everything spoon-fed to them than it is for people like me, who realize everyone is capable of providing references, settling debates, or escalating for shits and giggles without contributing anything substantial of their own. My humoring people like you, in that last category, stops at providing references when demanded. Pre-empting your bullshit is a waste of effort.
We are drowning in people relying on fake references provided by AI, and here you and those who think like you are, wondering why one should bother to substantiate or even bother to disagree with someone when calling them a liar or their views shit.
Step one in claiming someone said or did something wrong, that there's a better way is to demonstrate said better way, to lead by example. Literally, PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
The cashier tells you what the machine says the price is. Everyone involved knows that cash-registers are often wrong/out-of-date, or that the prices on the shelves haven't been up-dated but in many cases the store is still obligated to honor the price on the shelf, but its still on us to provide a picture of the shelf, or wait for another employee to be called to go check the shelf.
In your world, the cashier is wrong for not providing a picture of the shelf when telling you the price, for relying on the information at-hand and your equal ability to reference better sources if you have a problem with that, but the cashier doesn't set the prices and "the internet" doesn't magically work how you say just because you say it does or even if your version is en vogue.
You use the internet your way. I use it mine. You are as entitled to me providing references, ever, as I am to your home address. Everything in-between is a concession, a process, and if you want to skip steps, there's no reason to insert the extra step of demanding references without providing your own; No reason beyond making the active choice to waste everyone's time.
Tantrum? Assuming you can read and have any hope of understanding what I am trying to say with only a few paragraphs is the opposite of a tantrum. Tantrums involve few words and repeating the same thing, a demand if you will, over and over and with only the slightest of re-wordings, as you have done.