politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Most importantly, christian religion. I can only imagine the hysteria if some department head sent an agency wide Ramadan message or something.
There are unconfirmed reports that soldiers were being told the war with Iran was being justified with the Second Coming of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Apparently there are evangelical sects that believe the only way Jesus will appear is by forcing Iran and Russia to attack Israel.
Evangelicals took Christianity and circles back around to pagan idea. They literally think they can summon their god.
It's also evident when they talk about how weather events are linked to sinful behavior. Their idea of god is something that can be controlled through gay sex.
They are of course incapable of the logical thinking to understand how blasemous their own behavior is towards the Christian god.
I remember getting in an argument with a rather strident xtian and he questioned where I got my "information" from. I said: from your Bible [1], and pointed him in the direction of skeptic's annotated bible.
His reply: "of course you'd use a resource like this". Did it matter to him that it is annotating phrases from his supposedly revealed text? No, it did not. Having the word "skeptic" in there put him off of it and so, therefore, he just declared victory, I guess, LOL. A whole lot of xtians seem to think that "skeptic" is the same as "cynic" as a term.
[1] He was one of those annoying xtians - and probably everyone has run into them, because they seem to be everywhere - they often resort to one of the most presumptuous phrases in the English language and it's: "read your Bible".
It's presumptuous as fuck to assume I own a Bible. It's also presumptuous as fuck to assume that there is only one version of "the" bible - because there is not. And lastly, it's especially presumptuous because it seems to take as evident that the person saying it has read a version of "the" Bible, when odds are quite high that if they read it at all, it was select passages in a study group or something like that.
In his case it was especially ridiculous since he refused to even read his Bible at the prompting of something with the term "skeptic" in it, LOL.
Yeah agreed, but the site is called "Skeptic's annotated Bible" so they are going to notice. :)
https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/bible.php
Its mostly coming from Revelation. If the signs are fulfilled then the second coming is now a possibility whereas before that it's not. I remember growing up in the cult there was news about a dam being built in the middle east which got everyone hyped because that could be the catalyst for one of the signs since in theory it could change the flow of a river...
One of the other things called out is Israel being beset from all sides by the world or something then the 40k elect will show up and you get the second kingdom or something. Idk been a while since I read Revelation much longer since I took it literally
I wish it were real just so I could see the looks on their faces when he rejects them
That shit was going on in the 80s back when I was on active duty.
The military has long had some of it at particular facilities — the Air Force academy is notorious. But it's long been illegal, and was quite rare outside the military.
I thought there were multiple confirmations on that