this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
25 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
8733 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lol, just as Apple released their lowest cost laptop ever at $600

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not really sure how big of a difference it makes but isn't the memory on the Neo on the same die as the processor? The A18 Pro is also likely a lot of old binned chips that they've been collecting for a year. I wouldn't be surprises if this completely isolated them from the rising memory costs. Apple really lucked out on the timing of their release. Not that the Neo wouldn't have been an amazing value regardless either way.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And it uses literally the same exact hardware as the iPhone 🤣

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I honestly feel that's less of a diss on the Neo and more of a statement on how overpowered phones are now, especially considering the limitations placed on mobile OSes.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of the same hardware, yes.

But also - the CPU/GPU in the iPhones are insane.

Compared against a bunch of laptops in the price class from dell, HP, etc and the single-core performance is like 50% higher on the iPhone CPU in the macbook neo.

I can't wait for more ARM CPUs that hit these specs for a reasonable price.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Those single core performance numbers are entirely benchmaxxed and don't reflect real world performance or reality at all

EDIT: downvoters in denial. They get better synthetic Geekbench numbers compared to some of the latest desktop x86 processors ("beats" 7950X and "meets" 9950X), but get absolutely smoked by those same processors in real use. Maybe your only use of a computer is running Geekbench idk.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

EDIT: downvoters in denial. They get better synthetic Geekbench numbers compared to some of the latest desktop x86 processors ("beats" 7950X and "meets" 9950X), but get absolutely smoked by those same processors in real use. Maybe your only use of a computer is running Geekbench idk.

Where the heck are you getting these results from because there's absolutely no way these results are real. The M5 Max doesn't even get anywhere near the 9950X much less the A18 Pro.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, do people actually treat geekbench results with anything more than a pinch of salt outside of mobile? I thought people at least use Cinebench for this.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd guess the downvoters do. The apple fanboys really trying hard to convince themselves that their phone is faster than a 9950X 😂 they'll cling to anything that feeds the delusion

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Well this is the company that claimed to be on par with a 4090 after all...

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems you let you bias take over rather than actually knowing why you’re talking about.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except I'm factually correct.

Your words were correct but not your laughing smug face. You said it like it was some kind of own when really it was complementing iPhone’s.

I’ll hate on all the companies in the world, but I’ll do it based on facts and not allow my bias to make me look like a clown, as it did for you here.

Just try and be better is all I ask, else we may as well go hang around on r/conservative with all the other folk that don’t fact check and have no integrity.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

let me guess... it's got less processing power than an iPod Nano.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks quite the opposite to be fair

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

if it can't run more than 10 active tabs (and a basic program work related program) simultaneously it's a piece of shit.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and its STILL insultingly expensive for what it is.

A laptop with one of the worst modern keyboards with a dated ARM phone soc.. Where have I heard that before.

If the pinebook can exist for $200 in tiny volumes, the macbook with its massive production volume is absolutely a slap in the face. The BOM on that thing can't be more than $200-250 even with the wasteful packaging and marketing.

That should be filling the $399 space the eee pc laptops did. The costs should have diminished down by now.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Huh? The CPU has still one of the highest single core performance benchmarks on the market, especially considering it's fanless. The keyboard is also really good as they got rid of the butterfly in 2019, it is unfortunate, it has no backlight, and RAM is limited to 8 gigabytes. Otherwise, a good deal with how good the screen and speakers are, and solid aluminum build quality

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The keyboard is also really good as they got rid of the butterfly in 2019

Man, not OP so I do agree with everything else you said but the keyboard is only passable. Compared to laptops at this price range it is really good but overall? No way that keyboard can be considered good with that god awful key travel. I love my Neo for light tasks but no way I'm using that for any serious typing work.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gee mister I bet you sure do love paying phat margins on commodity goods.

To quote Allan Sugar, you've bought in to the mugs eyeful.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, I buy used ThinkPads for cheap.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 0 points 1 week ago

well, yeah, duh.