this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
25 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
8542 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And it uses literally the same exact hardware as the iPhone 🤣

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I honestly feel that's less of a diss on the Neo and more of a statement on how overpowered phones are now, especially considering the limitations placed on mobile OSes.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of the same hardware, yes.

But also - the CPU/GPU in the iPhones are insane.

Compared against a bunch of laptops in the price class from dell, HP, etc and the single-core performance is like 50% higher on the iPhone CPU in the macbook neo.

I can't wait for more ARM CPUs that hit these specs for a reasonable price.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Those single core performance numbers are entirely benchmaxxed and don't reflect real world performance or reality at all

EDIT: downvoters in denial. They get better synthetic Geekbench numbers compared to some of the latest desktop x86 processors ("beats" 7950X and "meets" 9950X), but get absolutely smoked by those same processors in real use. Maybe your only use of a computer is running Geekbench idk.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

EDIT: downvoters in denial. They get better synthetic Geekbench numbers compared to some of the latest desktop x86 processors ("beats" 7950X and "meets" 9950X), but get absolutely smoked by those same processors in real use. Maybe your only use of a computer is running Geekbench idk.

Where the heck are you getting these results from because there's absolutely no way these results are real. The M5 Max doesn't even get anywhere near the 9950X much less the A18 Pro.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, do people actually treat geekbench results with anything more than a pinch of salt outside of mobile? I thought people at least use Cinebench for this.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd guess the downvoters do. The apple fanboys really trying hard to convince themselves that their phone is faster than a 9950X 😂 they'll cling to anything that feeds the delusion

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Well this is the company that claimed to be on par with a 4090 after all...

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems you let you bias take over rather than actually knowing why you’re talking about.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except I'm factually correct.

Your words were correct but not your laughing smug face. You said it like it was some kind of own when really it was complementing iPhone’s.

I’ll hate on all the companies in the world, but I’ll do it based on facts and not allow my bias to make me look like a clown, as it did for you here.

Just try and be better is all I ask, else we may as well go hang around on r/conservative with all the other folk that don’t fact check and have no integrity.