this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
808 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29509 readers
4276 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well DUH.

Thanks for catching up to the rest of us, MAGA!

Ears don't heal themselves like that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well DUH.

I don't think a school shooter trying to clip the President so his sempais at Demolition Ranch will notice him is as crazy a theory as "Trump paid a teenager to wing him in the ear so he could..." I'm not sure what exactly? Beat a punching bag like Kamala Harris by an extra point when he was already favored to win?

Like, the guy standing behind Trump did die. This "fake" assassination was using real ammo.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He wasn't hit in the ear. The kid was told to shoot into the crowd, Trump made his own ear bloody. Not his first live kayfabe performance.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The kid was told to shoot into the crowd

At the crowd behind Trump, but not at Trump? And then he got near enough to the mark that he shattered the teleprompter which was right in front of Trump? And kill a guy just off his shoulder?

Come on, dude. Is it really so hard to believe someone sincerely wanted this guy dead?

I'm more inclined to believe this was a deliberate hit job (by, say, the FBI or CIA... or OUN-B) that failed than a fake hit job that succeeded.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also, I find it harder to believe the CIA failed to assassinate him than that it was a publicity stunt.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

harder to believe the CIA failed to assassinate him

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_assassination_attempts_on_Fidel_Castro

The 1975 Church Committee claimed eight proven CIA assassination attempts between 1960 and 1965. In 1976, President Gerald Ford issued Executive Order 11905 banning political assassinations. In 2006, Fabián Escalante, former chief of Cuba's intelligence, stated that there had been 634 assassination schemes or attempts.

They eventually got him at age 92 with the oldest CIA trick in the book - waiting until he dies of natural causes.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

They'll get him eventually

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I do find it hard to believe that someone would risk their life to take a shot at Trump. There's more to the story one way or another.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's no more illogical than any school shooter who ends up killing themselves halfway through a spree

This guy is no less logical than the Columbine or Sandy Hook shooters