this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
270 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29509 readers
4293 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s pick to be secretary of the Navy has said some crazy things.

The Pentagon confirmed that failed congressional candidate and current undersecretary of the Navy Hung Cao would be replacing John Phelan, who was abruptly fired on Wednesday. It’s an appalling move, given that Cao once made a poor joke about the KKK in an interview with Steve Bannon.

“I know I’ll be attacked by the left, and call me a white supremacist, but I have one ask for them, it’s just than when you give my hood, make sure it’s got the little slits and not the circles so I can see better,” Cao said on Real America’s Voice during his failed 2024 campaign for Senate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 45 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (14 children)

So he's saying that the left is going to call him a white supremacist and he's owning it? He sounds proud of it. His name is Hung Cao? This is another leopards at my face waiting to happen. Also seems like he's stealing some valor.

Cao has also claimed in multiple interviews that he was “shot at” and “blown up” while serving in the Navy, and and has “scars,” describing himself as “100% disabled,” but his service record doesn’t show him receiving a Purple Heart, which is given to service members who have been seriously injured by enemy fire, or the Navy’s Combat Action Ribbon. When USA Today asked him about his service record in 2024, he issued an angry statement.

“I want to give you all a window into what it’s like being a combat veteran who had the gall to run for public office against a career politician. Any veteran will read this with the same disgust. Imagine being asked to provide documentation of the dates and times Al Qaeda shot at you. Imagine being asked, if you’re a disabled veteran, why don’t you have a Purple Heart?” Cao posted.

Edit: Could this be PTSD?

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 19 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'm a Navy veteran with service connected PTSD. People question if I have PTSD sometimes and it does indeed piss me off, but I'm not out here claiming to have been blown up while serving. People are starting to become aware that PTSD doesn't always stem from combat, and that awareness will help more people going forward. Mine comes from being attacked and raped by my shipmates, I didn't expect to survive it.

I don't feel disgust that USA Today asked him about his service, instead I wonder why he didn't have a better response. He could have offered education about PTSD or said he wanted to increase transparency around disability ratings in the VA, or any number of things.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Mine comes from being attacked and raped by my shipmates

I'll take "things that make me hate humanity" for $1000, Alex.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Bet that's the cause of more cases of PTSD that actual combat

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 1 points 1 hour ago

I think so, too. This is why it's important to talk about non-combat PTSD. So more people get the help they need, and there's less stigma around it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

That's exactly it. If it is PTSD, he should talk about that. He's talking about physical scars, so it's hard to parse.

I'm really sorry about the PTSD, especially the cause. I hope the help you're getting is beneficial. IME, people who haven't been exposed to mental health issues, can be really stupid about them.

load more comments (11 replies)