this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
298 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29599 readers
2169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is that the smell of someone being cooked?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm actually terrified of this. With all it's flaws and even evilness - I/we can't ignore the fact that it was keeping other major powers in check. China would far more likely invade Taiwan and likely whatever else they want, I'm in Baltics so.. Russia won't be so scared to attack it. Shipping lanes and global transportation of goods will no longer be protected by US (where credit is due, they really cared about it, up until Trump), other powers like Pakistan, Turkey and Venezuela might get funny ideas, etc.

Ironically, world without US would look less secure to me

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ironically, world without US would look less secure to me

On the other hand, the world wouldn't have wars and coups, caused by the USA.

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 7 points 11 hours ago

Sooo... Currently unstable regions get a bit less unstable and stable regions get to become unstable? I guess we would be nicely averaging out then. Is this us government communist after all? Equality for all, but not the equality anyone desired! :(

/s incase it wasn't obvious

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If the US goes down, they won't be able to NIMBY over South America. Those countries can rise to prominence on the world stage.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, because the US military is just going to vanish if the government collapses.

All those aircraft carriers, nuclear subs, and land based missiles will just leave.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Gotta pay and feed your soldiers and sailors and pilots to keep that military running.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

The US military will be too busy with power struggles to care about South America.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago

They'll likely be subdivided between costal states and be scrapped. A lot of that shit is non-viable to maintain if you aren't the US, if memory serves right aircraft carriers are generally built in Maine for example kinda doubt South Carolina has the infrastructure to maintain one.

Mind you that's assuming a lot of things going a relatively specific way but I can't imagine even a reduced federal government maintaining any of the fleets.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I, too, am actually terrified of this yet still looking forward to it.

we can’t ignore the fact that it was keeping other major powers in check

But otoh it was also always the major power stirring the pot, and more so recently. So much that that argument doesn't hold anymore imo.