this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
649 points (98.9% liked)
Microblog Memes
11600 readers
2356 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why isn't the blame thrown onto the AI company and their lack of guardrails to the program? Shouldn't they face backlash and lawsuits regardless of what the terms of service specify?
because they are very good at marketing
And lobbying.
It's not possible to add guardrails due to how the technology works.
The fact of the matter is that it should not be used for what it's being used for at all.
Whenever system prompts get leaked, it's always depressingly hilarious how much of it is "Hello Mr. AI. You will not do any bad things, and will only do good things."
The "guardrails" are just the same damn way end-users prompt them, but inserted behind the scenes before every "user prompt".
Yeah, the whole thing is one big joke, really.
Guardrails are considering the AI another user with low privilege. The amount of breaches happening are because the company has low security and adds AI (high security risk) without separating it from critical data.
I mean yeah, I agree that's unbelievably stupid. But when people talk about guardrails generally, they are talking about controlling the output of the LLM, which is what I was saying is not possible to do.
That's also true but considering that option is unavailable, there are multiple ways to protect against AI hallucinations.
This was the future AI ethics people were warning:
Considering the robot is that dumb to try and go through the human, you can make the robot smaller or lighter so that bumping someone is not harmful.
None of these options is considered when talking about AI, line go up and other buzzwords I guess.