this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
438 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29654 readers
2091 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disapproval rose to 62%, the worst of his two terms in office, amid economic issues since launching his war against Iran

Six months out from November’s midterm US elections, Donald Trump’s disapproval rating has reached 62% – the worst of his two terms in office – according to a new Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.

The US president received his worst ratings on the cost of living and other economic issues since launching his deeply unpopular war against Iran in February, which has plunged the global economy into an oil crisis and sent gas prices rocketing to a four-year high.

Trump achieved majority disapproval on his management of every issue measured, including Americans disapproved of his handling of that war by 66% to 32%, while a staggering 76% disapproved and only 23% approved of his handling of the cost of living. Two-thirds of Americans now feel the country is headed in the wrong direction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 89 points 3 days ago (4 children)

As much as I like seeing the high disapproval numbers, I find it a bit disappointing how many people will turn on their president over gas prices. I mean, after all the insane shit this guy has pulled, all it takes is a buck or two more per gallon to turn them. We aren't even in a shortage situation. No lines. Nothing.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think it’s more a case that the people for whom gas prices are A Thing have now joined all the people who already disapproved of him… so another 5% of the population, who believed his lies right up until there was no denying that his actions were hitting their pocketbooks.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

But that's the point: the suffering of others, which they could prevent simply by voting, wasn't enough for them. It wasn't until it hit them in the pocketbook this way (after reduced healthcare and still-unmaintained infrastructure and tariff tax and, and, and) in addition to all this other ways it preventably hit them in the pocketbook already, that now they jump on board the harm-reduction bandwagon.

There are simply no more arguments for supporting this man that make sense logically; and there haven't been for 10 years (before his first narcissist orade if fools), of course, but the apology now needs to be a little more sincere.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As someone else put it: "I'm fine with rapes and pedophilia, but I draw the line at higher gas prices!"

[–] ursus262@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What does that say about America? I think it's past saving to be honest.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Probably that the rural, least populated parts of the country hold a disproportionate amount of political power and this is a consequence of that. Well that and the deliberate defunding/deconstruction of our education system.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What does that say about America?

Nothing the rest of the world didn't already know.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly it's the same here in France, and I suspect everywhere... Most people only give a shit about criminal/immoral behavior from the elite if it confirms their political bias. If it's their guy they'll wring their hands for a couple of seconds and go "oh well, what can you do? They're all the same anyways", or even outright defend them.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I fear you're right. It'd be foolish to think America has a monopoly on short-sighted, selfish dimwits. Rassemblement National and AfD polls bear sad testimony to this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

saving to be honest.

You're saving to be honest, but I'm saving for the invasion. We are not the same.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It has immediate impact and they cannot lie about the giant numbers in their face while they pump. Even the dumbest of people can grasp this.

This.

ICE kidnapping people doesn't affect them because they are special. They are in the in-group.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why can't they grasp it when he boldly lies to our faces?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly? I think for most they're too far deep in the right-wing Matrix to be able to tell truth from lies. Many people don't fully understand just how these people live in a completely alternate reality than the likes of you and me.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I get that. I just don't understand how gas prices are able to permeate that veil, while disappearing healthcare, people being abducted off the street and shoved into concentration camps, international pedophile rings, intimidation of the media, bribery, and white people being cut down in the street without consequences, etc. etc. remains firmly sequestered.

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

All of those examples are things they know about through the press and social media. So either they chose not to believe the lying press, or they get the content moderated in such a way that it all sounds acceptable. The latter of course takes having sick values, but not as sick as you would expect based on the info you get about what is happening in the world.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yea. There are by now hundreds of valid reasons to kick that guy, and gas prices are the deal breaker?

Many Americans just seem to hate all other humans

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Many Americans just seem to hate all other humans

I would say it's more pathological indifference, likely spawned from the idolization of "rugged individualism". I'm often reminded of a nearly decade-old article titled "I Don't Know How To Explain To You That You Should Care About Other People".