this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
158 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29661 readers
2591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The fiery dispute centered on a proposal that would have allowed agents to enter homes without judicial warrants

An internal dispute over how to carry out Donald Trump’s deportation agenda grew so heated that officials had to “clear the room,” according to a new report.

The argument unfolded during a February 2025 meeting attended by Rodney Scott, the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, and Caleb Vitello, who was then the acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Scott and his deputies were advocating for a “master plan” — approved by then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem — that called for establishing a National Incident Command Center, which would tap the resources of ICE, CBP and the Pentagon, NBC News reported.

The plan was part of an effort to dramatically ramp up deportations to 1 million per year, lining up with the president’s promise to carry out the largest illegal immigrant expulsion program in U.S. history.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How much of a feckless doofus babybrain do you have to be to see this and not imagine that the monster they're creating will be turned on minorities, dissidents, and ultimately anybody inconvenient to the regime? Even if you're a twisted sack of shit who likes the sound of that, you're about as sharp as a sock full of soup if you think this will work out for you.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They understand all that. What they don't understand is that the in-group will keep shrinking until they're no longer in it.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm running out of ways to describe such mental myopia.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm running out of ways to even mentally react to the escalating holocaust. I feel hopeless. The holocaust is happening and there's nothing I can do to stop it. People I love might be victims of it. If it spreads to Canada, just as the nazis spread to neighbouring countries, I might be a victim of it. The nazis might destroy everything I care about and I just have to try and carry on in the meantime because I don't want to stop living because of a threat that may not get to me. The threat may hang over my head for decades, I don't want to stop living in the meantime. I must carry on and just hope Canada stays safe from the nazis. As Nick Fury said, until such time as the world ends we will act as though it intends to spin on

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago

Lying. They're just lying to you. Lots of people believe them because they believe things based on how good they feel to think about.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

They also don't seem to understand that these leaders will put them all in the poor house.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

History ignored is history repeated

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

We all saw this shit coming and it still happened, I don't know what to tell you. History enthusiasts love to say that, but historians are usually even gloomier.

[–] SparkyBauer44@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am stealing that sock full of soup phrase. Thank you for your service.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

I actually got that from Corner Gas, which someone recommended to me the other day when I was asking for show recommendations!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

gobblin himmler wants the numbers to go up