this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
855 points (99.0% liked)

linuxmemes

31329 readers
335 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    2-in-1 shampoos suck tho, so unix wins again

    [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Exactly.

    Shampoo is supposed to remove dirt and grease from your hair. Conditioner is supposed to replace the necessary oils your hair needs to have. ... Which need to be replaced because the shampoo just washed them all away. In order to make a 2-in-1 shampoo and conditioner, they have to make a significant compromise, producing a shampoo that doesn't wash all the grime out and a conditioner that doesn't stay and replenish as well as a standalone one would. So you get both in one bottle ... but a shitty version of both. Using separate products will work much better. Even the cheapest shampoo and cheapest conditioner out there, used individually, will easily outperform even the fanciest combination.

    Oh, and while we're here... That thing on the bottle that says 'lather, rinse, repeat'? It's not just for fun, and not just because they want you to use more shampoo. It actually does work noticeably better if you do it twice in a row.

    [–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I am following your logic, but as someone who's been using a 2 in 1 for like a decade, I can tell you everyones hair needs are different. I've used them separately as well and it really does not make a difference for me.

    Even the cheapest shampoo and cheapest conditioner out there, used individually, will easily outperform even the fanciest combination.

    But I really take offence to this line, absolutely not true. The cheapest shampoo will dry up/irritate your scalp, the cheapest conditioner will make your hair feel like an oil spill.

    [–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

    irrelevant unless you can prove you aren't bald

    [–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    Folks shampoo is for you skalp/hair roots and conditioner is for the tips only.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUbbx00iVqs&t=192

    [–] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

    Which means conditioner is irrelevant for anyone without long hair

    [–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
    [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    I have really long hair and another benefit of doing them separately is, it's easiest to brush it right after applying conditioner, and harder when it has shampoo in it. So there's that on top of really needing the conditioner to work well.

    [–] albbi@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

    Shampoo: Remove oils and thereby remove dirt attached to oils. Conditioner: Restore oils to your hair.

    2-in-1: Restore oils while also removing oils?