this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
585 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29715 readers
2773 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump announced Sunday that Republicans plan to dispense a large “Election Integrity Army” to every single state for the 2026 midterms – invoking his debunked claims that the United States does not have fair elections. In a message on his Truth Social platform the president appeared to attribute his “Historic Election in 2024” to the fact that the Republican National Committee sent thousands of volunteers across the country to poll watch or assist with election litigation through a volunteer program. “During my Historic Election in 2024, when I won every single Swing State, and decisively won both the Electoral and Popular votes by wide margins, the Republicans had an Election Integrity Army in every single State to preserve the sanctity of each legal vote. We will be doing the same again in 2026, but it will be much bigger and stronger,” Trump wrote. Trump did not elaborate on who would be part of the “Election Integrity Army” or how large it would be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

How are you guys who stayed home feeling? You could have helped prevent this bullshit from happening, and you did nothing.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

But if Harris had won, Israel would have continued committing genocide!

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Yes, and they would have had less support from the US, given that she supports a 2-state solution vs wanting to bulldoze the entirety of Gaza.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something something Kamala bad

Something something Zionist-Hitler "dems are as bad as real nazis" generic tankie cope, etc

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They are still insisting that they are in the right.

I say that a movement that can't be bothered to vote, or even spoil its ballot, is not credible in doing the higher order civil disobedience.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They literally expect people to fight a civil war against the Republicans, then they expect to have a seat at the table in the restructuring of the government.

They are literally the reason this shit is happening. Fuck the Idle Left. They do nothing but complain.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You are very good at typing not-particularly-true-things that divide those who should be opposed to the current regime. Also using vague language where you're talking about a tiny fraction of the population but you make it sound so much grander while retaining deniability. Does the GOP pay you, or do you do it for love of the game?

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org -1 points 18 hours ago

Spare me that nonsense. You see people on her all the damned time talking about not voting (proud of this fact), and they refuse to participate in our democracy. This same exact group of people think that somehow, they will be part of the conversation in recreating the country after a conflict happens.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll learn the hard way, as history has shown us time and time again.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure will.

And those of us with brain cells will learn right along with them.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They are still insisting that they are in the right.

Of course they are. They're petulant children.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But that brown lady laughed funny. And she's ARROGANT.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And she was a GENOCIDER. She was actually GENOCIDING.

GENOCIDE GENOCIDE GENOCIDE.....oh fuck Donald Trump is president again. Uh.....GENOCIDE.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'The democrats didn't run a primary 4 months before the general election, so I'm going to sit out because the VP of the current president stood down because I was mad that he had a debate and did poorly whilst being sick and being jet lagged. The democrats also said I couldn't be a member of the Pink Pony Club and I didn't like that.'

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago

'That'll show 'em! We owned the libs harder than the actual conservatives! And since I'm in no way a lib, this all has zero repercussions for me!'

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're as bad or worse than MAGAts.

But "something something genocide blah blah blah".

Anyone that thinks genocide in another part of the world is worth sacrificing democracy in their own country is a fool not worth speaking to.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are worse in my mind.

They know trump is bad. They know the actions of the republican party are bad.

They, in their 'wisdom' are too stubborn, entitled, or lazy, to actually do something against these forces. Instead, they'd rather spend their time online evangelizing their own pet causes and attacking anyone who actually does anything against these people.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Fuck these types and their moralizing and their purity tests and their little gotcha games they think they are winning. Infuriating.

They act like some perfect candidate/party will just emerge if they stamp their feet hard enough.

Sure, the redcaps are dangerous and annoying in their own way - I would imagine a lot of them are functionally illiterate - ~20% of American adults are functionally illiterate.

But focusing only on 2023, 28% of adult Americans are at level 1 or below in literacy and 34% in numeracy. And only 44% and 38%, respectively, are at or above level 3 in these domains.

^ From Patheos. I've seen others claiming about 21%. I'll say 20% just to be conservative. In any case, it is bad and I bet a sizeable amount of people are terrible at critical thinking and/or spotting logical fallacies, as well. Not to mention those with overactive amygdalas creating far too much emotionalism and a thirst of simple "solutions" driving them into the arms of Republicans. It's hard to get them to accept basic reality, never mind actually having some understanding.

But a whole lot of these often overly-online people don't seem to fall into this nexus per se. They seem to have galaxy-brained their way into thinking they are this rare breed of the truly morally superior creatures and no one else has ever noticed the flaws of the Democratic party/certain candidates. 🙄

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You're spot on man. One side has the illiterate, and the other side has people who agree with stuff 'in principle' but refuse to actually vote.

It's literally no wonder Democrats move to the center, because rational republicans have joined the party. And what's more is those rational republicans generally adapt to the party, and they don't pull them to the right.

The other fucking issue that infuriates me is that not every district is in NY where you can elect AOC. I love AOC, but she's flat out not electable in a lot of the country. Guys like Talrico are just as valuable as her, because they'll probably agree on 70% of the platform.

The terminally online Left refuses to vote for anyone unless they agree with every single point they make. And this is only exacerbated by countries like Israel and Russia who want Republicans in office and not Democrats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The terminally online Left refuses to vote for anyone unless they agree with every single point they make. And this is only exacerbated by countries like Israel and Russia who want Republicans in office and not Democrats.

This is such a key point. Foreign actors are likely to benefit from having the country run by idiot Republicans. And if you consider billionaires to be part of that group - foreign actors (and they do, since they will surely pull up stakes, take all their money and go somewhere else if they must) they have a lot of the same motivation to have an inept government.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 1 points 12 hours ago

Exactly. That's why people are downvoting this uncomfortable truth. The 'left' doesn't believe they also are targets for the bullshit Russia and Israel do to this country.