this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
177 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84817 readers
4971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

IDK how many jobs AI is actually taking?

With higher interest rates there's less venture capital around to pour into the data centre build out, so tech companies are cutting back on their wage bills to channel money into building data centres.

AI might give some jobs a productivity boost, but it's more like: 90 people can do the work 100 people did before. It's not like, oh we don't need these 10,000 employees in mumbai anymore because AI is developing that product now.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 minutes ago

AI companies are switching to token based billing. Money is running out and heavy AI users are going to have to pay closer to the real price. People suddenly having to pay 10 times as much. You can just as well hire an intern for that money.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I think we'll also see increased burnout as employees are expected to produce more with less.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 11 points 4 hours ago

yes, it's when you tell boss, "I can't do that in 3 hours, it'll take two weeks", and probably still have some unknown aspects of quality, that we might not want to sign off on. Maybe we can rush it in 1 week, if you're ok with want want maybe' 20% unverified.

Boss fucks off to coprolite - gets it "done" in 3 hours. Gives it to someone else to QR. They comes back to me for advice on turd polishing (apparently that's my SME). So I then waste time helping that person tactfully create a quality report that says it's seriously defective and will take weeks to rectify to get it up to an acceptable standard - because it tells us nothing about how it got to it's erroneous output.

Now, we've wasted about a day between us, on dog-shite - and we've not learned anything useful.

I don't know what a "gen Z" is though, but whoever they are they should stand up to shite bosses.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

"Here's an expensive chatbot that lies exactly 73% of the time. Now stop reviewing and testing code."