this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
568 points (97.5% liked)

me_irl

7739 readers
468 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 147 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (80 children)

For the second comment, if the bow is there to please men and infantilize women, why don't you just buy a pair that doesn't have the bow? I'm all for calling out sexism and over sexualization, but i think this is just a case of capitalism being capitalism. Panties with bows probably just sell better to a significant demographic of women.

[–] Monkyhands@feddit.dk 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I mean, I agree the comment is mostly ragebait or not serious. However, I wanted to mention that you may be underestimating how large a proportion of women's knickers have this bow. I usually cut them off, as they are just annoying, but honestly in my experience, the vast majority of knickers have this.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I usually cut them off

How I felt reading this comment

bouta link that entire speech from New Girl about how it's okay to like pretty things haha

[–] Monkyhands@feddit.dk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is indeed OK to like pretty things. But the bows are sort of a visible lump on the front, if I'm wearing leggings/ soft trousers/ dress.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (77 replies)