this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
721 points (98.5% liked)

Selfhosted

56958 readers
1762 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone,

We've built an open-source, privacy-preserving alternative to Ring cameras using a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W (called Secluso). It uses end-to-end encryption to send videos from the camera to a mobile app, which is available both in Google Play Store and Apple App Store. We also support Obtainium for people that do not wish to use Google Play.

We've put in a lot of effort to make it easy to set up! You can set up our camera on your own Pi in less than 5 minutes with minimal technical expertise using our easy-to-use GUI deploy tool. Here are our setup guide and open source release.

The image shows a Pi in an official Raspberry Pi enclosure that you can use for your camera. We've also been working on a HAT for the Pi to add night vision, audio, temperature monitoring for safety, all in a compact form factor. You can see the HAT and an enclosure for the whole camera in the photo.

We've been working on this for almost 2 years now, and we look forward to we look forward to seeing what you all think!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 307 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (7 children)

These comments are why privacy products will always be behind. Why open-source is full of dead projects. These people are just trying to make a living off making privacy-focused products. And all the comments are like "They're a for-profit company? They had marketing material prepped to reply to people's comments?!".

The code is open-source, self-hostable, built using commodity hardware (raspi), and they're just trying to make it sustainable by providing an optional paid service. This is not the enemy.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 33 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No good deed goes unpunished. The sense of self entitlement some people display is staggering. FOSS project? Well, you should have done x y or z.

Also, I gave you $3 via Ko-fi, so you need to provide customer support in perpetuity and come to my house and install it. And heaven forbid you try to recoup costs!

Projects don't just die out - a lot of them are killed (one way or another). For example, I had a fully specced out FPGA design that would capture the signal from Wii GPU and do internal upscaled resolution (think: like what dolphin emulator does but with actual hardware) not just post process sharpening. Total cost under $100 and some know how.

The amount of flack I copped for it made me shut down the github and work on it for myself. Once it's perfected, I may post about it again but I sure as shit am not compelled to deal with the fucking peanut gallery anymore.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I used to think Reddit users were too negative. Then I joined Lemmy.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago

Loud people are negative. Doesn't matter the website.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 103 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, free, open source is fun, but we should also just support companies that have good ethics and want to make enough money to earn a living and keep making good products that respect people.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I want utopian space communism, but I'm not going to hold out for only that ideal when I can support alternatives that are better than the current system.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

You do you, but I'm holding out for it... and only in fully automated, luxury, gay form.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

You have my blessing.

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 13 points 19 hours ago

Yeah supporting companies which makes privacy focused products, will create incentives for selling them to people which want them not just gaining additional profits from selling your data or showing you with ads

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

A "privacy product" inherently involves a lot of trust. When the creators are academics with little to no professional footprint, you need to assess things based on what information they do provide you. Whether that be code (yay open source) or customer interactions (forum posts).

I know we all yearn for the days of "Use Google. Their motto is 'do no evil' so you know they are our friends!". But... that was a much stupider time.

Like, even if you suckle at the teat of Saint Capitalism, you should at least want a good product. And.. this looks like enthusiast code with minimal maintainability but a heavy emphasis on marketing.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I see this with open source hardware a lot.

People want to get atoms for free. That doesn't work. Give your money to companies like this.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed, however the number of positive comments from one-day old accounts is suspect for me.

This is a security product where trust is paramount, so I get a bit itchy about anything like that, but I could be overreacting.

[–] jkaczman@lemmy.zip 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I can't speak to the account thing, I checked the guy you replied to and it seems like his is 3 months old, not yesterday.

I wanted to mention that we plan to get a third-party security audit by a reputable firm sometime this summer.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Yea I edited that part because Lemmy was not showing me the right info, but there are more below, which is.. Odd.

In any event, great to hear about an SA, and I have starred the project to check it out.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago

Money for nothin' and your chicks for free. What a blessed utopia that must be.