politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
No, Trump has closed the border. Biden could have done it had he wanted to.
Brother, they haven't changed any immigration policies since Trump 1, with the exception of enforcement measures. You've been lied to, and badly. I'm sorry you had to find out this way. Publicly, on the internet, where everyone can see how much of an idiot you've been till now
Why didn't Biden implement these enforcement measures?
Foul! That's moving the goalposts. Sorry, brother, but you done committed a crime most egregious. You claimed that Biden open the borders, I refuted that stating that you were lied to and that immigration policy didn't change under Biden. You either need to prove that policy DID change under Biden, otherwise your foul will be permanent. And we all know what happens to individuals with permanent fouls (hint, it rhymes with pemical pastration)
To the contrary, you said that US immigration policy never changed but enforcement measures did. So, the question, is why didn't Biden implement enforcement measures to stop the flood of illegal migrants? Trump has been able to stop them; there is no reason Biden couldn't.
Mon frer, you made the extraordinary claim. You need to supply proof. I won't count that as strike two (which is good, that one rhymes with pobotomy, and you don't need any more help in that category)
Proof of what? That Biden allowed illegal migrants to flood across the border?
Open border policy. Show when it took effect and when Trump stopped it. Fox cannot be a source
Biden didn't officially have an open border policy, but he permitted illegal migrants to flood across the border. From https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/21/texas-migrants-busing-cost-greg-abbott/
In April 2022, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott announced his state was going to start transporting to other states migrants who had been released from federal custody. He said he was doing it to prevent the state from shouldering “the burdens imposed by open-border advocates in other parts of the country.”
Nearly two years later, Texas has transported more than 102,000 migrants to New York, Chicago, Denver, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
Yes, that isn't proof. Congrats! You're maybe starting to see. Abbott's stunt was a stunt meant to force the "immigrants are surging" narrative, not actual needed policy changes to address an issue. Find. Proof. That. Immigrants. Surged. As. A. Result. Of. Biden's. Policies. You have one chance left (reminder, pemical pastration)
If it was just a stunt, there would be few migrants to send. Don't you remember illegal migrants flooding El Paso? See https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/14/el-paso-migrants-border/
That's an anecdote and not proof of your claim! DHS estimated 11.4 million undocumented migrants in the US in 2022. A 100,000 in Texas could've been there FOR YEARS. You need evidence (numbers, data, studies on policy impacts, fuck even a changed policy) that what you're saying is true. This is all "action" taken "in response" but that isn't PROOF that the thing itself was happening. I could go out to my yard and burn all of the grass because "grass killed my mother". My burning of the grass isn't evidence that grass killed my mother. Do you understand the disconnect?