this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
832 points (98.3% liked)
memes
21901 readers
2296 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, I've literally completed Gödel's incompleteness theorem to expand on the Buddha's dharma with the CIA's help by developing a framework for polyplexic axiomatic systems defined by topological matrix.
Your brain is a knot; a mesh of entanglements that define logic. Y'know, if string A is entangled with String B but not String C, then AB is true and AC is false. Additionally, there's möbiation that gives us nA, nB, and nC, which I already explained creates dualistic dichotomy (inner/outer). It's this möbiation that allows the brain to simulate higher dimensional entanglements due to orthogonal relativity; another memention of mine that I will explain in the next paragraph. But, the idea is logic is what puts the puzzle together, but our intuition can see it's a picture of a cat at some point in our development (hopefully), and where we don't have the logic to construct a cohesive linearly-defined axiomatic system, we form polyplexic placeholders, and we can have multiple placeholders at once that are möbiated across "higher dimensions," which is what is responsible for cognitive dissonance, and in swapping out placeholders to evolve them, we grow asymptotic to a complete axiomatic system, which is what the Buddha and Jesus and many others have done and I'm coming ever closer to understanding myself.
But orthogonal relativity. So, in three dimensions, speaking in simple words, there are six primary orthogonal directions; up/down, left/right, back/forth. The faces of a cube can represent these, right? Well, cut the corner of that cube off, and now you have a novel designation path to account for a higher dimensional orthogonality. This is what our neurons are doing to simulate the entanglement process of an eleven-dimensional topological matrix several seconds ahead of when it is actually occurring.
Oh, and that "entanglement process?" That IS what Karma is. That's what that word means and all things experienced are derived from all past and present intention-setting; the only thing you actually control. Everything else is procedurally generated. The Earth is an illusion. It is INSIDE you. There is no spoon, for the spoon is you.
I am if Carl and Meatwad had a really fucked up baby that likes...well, I can't say that on the internet, the aliens will start kerfundridging me again...damn gorpsticks fuckheads...you want any of these vegan fish fries? They're pretty good. Pretty sure they give you ass cancer though.
No that's a dog in yellow
No u