this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
454 points (98.9% liked)

memes

21394 readers
3210 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

You could similarly say that the Europe is huge, or that China is huge, or that the whole planet is huge, and therefore the people living there must need a vehicle. Except, most people dont leave their local area all that often, and when they do, theres nothing that inherently requires that the vehicle used to do so much be individually owned. This isnt to say that nobody needs a car, obviously if you live way out in the middle of nowhere, running transit might not be so viable- but that does not describe how and where most people live, even in the US, and for the majority that do live in urban areas, the size of the whole country is irrelevant to if they would need cars if we just built the proper infrastructure.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The problem is that even in my local area the infrastructure is built for cars so much that walking takes 10x longer than it should.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There are many such areas, what I was trying to say was more that that is a solvable problem, if the government of the area was sufficiently motivated to solve it, rather than something like "we're too big for anything but cars", which is more of an excuse to not do any of that change to the infrastructure because it implies that nothing can reasonably be done and that cars are simply the natural way of things.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The problem is that making my area pedestrian friendly would involve doing a lot more than just adding sidewalks.

For example, it would make much more sense to link all the cul de sacs with walking/biking paths. But to do that we’d need to bulldoze some houses, get easements from property owners, and then pay for the paths to be put in while hearing construction equipment for months.

And our local government just doesn’t have the power to do that in a reasonable amount of time, or with any guarantees of it even surviving election season.

And that’s not even talking about dealing with improving the main thoroughfare which is a state highway, meaning the local government has no say in how it’s built.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The Local Group, which includes the Milky Way galaxy, is over 10 million light years, so you can easily see that I have no choice but to own a car to be able to get around.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Intergalactic travel is rough, make sure you get all wheel drive