this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
207 points (97.3% liked)

memes

21394 readers
3969 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The dominion voting machine company was bought by a Republican business man. It's now called "Liberty Vote". Those machines are used in more than half the states, and their counting function which is used to count votes gets "calibrated" before the count. That calibration (eg. What sample cards return votes for what parties) determines who wins.

At the same time, security researchers, federal advisories and election experts have documented software vulnerabilities and real-world procedural failures that could be exploited if safeguards and chain-of-custody practices break down

Most election‑security experts highlighted to journalists and in formal letters that the riskiest failures are procedural: poor chain-of-custody, lax physical security, careless software updates and insider actions

https://factually.co/fact-checks/technology/are-dominion-voting-machines-reliable-can-data-be-manipulated-c78d7a

Anyways I'm sure Trump isn't capable of breaking down safeguards \s

[–] MrQuallzin@pie.eyeofthestorm.place 1 points 12 minutes ago

I'm confused what conspiracy you're trying to sell here. From your AI source:

no credible evidence, however, has been produced showing large‑scale, remote or systemic vote‑flipping by Dominion machines in national elections, and routine audits and paper trails are the practical defense that has verified results in contested contests

Security experts say something could happen in very specific scenarios if safeguards broke down. That sounds just like any other high profile company, so not sure what makes them different. From what I've read since they were bought, there haven't been any actual instances of tampering and they've had clean audits.