this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
949 points (99.7% liked)
People Twitter
10037 readers
377 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In fact, you can.
How good it will be, how performant and how fast you'll have it ready is an entirely different question.
There are plenty of open source models though that can be run locally. So getting a beefy server and running a local LLM there might already do sobe of the tasks you need the big babble machines for.
Others were talking on other threads that local llm models made for a specific task would have a lot more accuracy and usefulness. Forget all of the technical details they cited though.
Ai isn't bad at tasks where the end result is essentially known to start with, translation, data organization, metadata tagging, etc. You know what the result should be already, somewhat, and so does the Ai. The problem is solved in that there isn't one.
It's the shit that it's bad at that it's sold on, though - objective truth per itself and self-help also, according to itself.
Open source? Other LLM? I thought we would do it from scratch, mathematics or something lol
It's just a big ol' Markov chain how hard could it be?
How much could it cost? Ten billion dollars?
Pretty sure in a month building and running such a thing they'd have spent more money than a year's worth of tokens. Unless it just sucked. I could get a model that sucks real bad running in like an hour for him, have him call me.