this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
961 points (99.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
11607 readers
2596 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You were taught incorrectly then, I grew up catholic as well (also now atheist) and it was made very clear to me that it is not symbolic, it is an actual transformation. This is directly from the US conference of catholic bishops website: Is the Eucharist a symbol? The transformed bread and wine are truly the Body and Blood of Christ and are not merely symbols.
I remember very specifically that learning this official belief being one of the things that made me start questioning my religion. Like I can very clearly see that no transformation is happening so, it started making me question everything else they were telling me.
I was told in Catholic school that if you don't believe in transubstantiation, you're not Catholic. They made it very clear that you're supposed to believe the Eucharist is literally flesh, and the wine is literally blood. That was the day I realized I was definitely not Catholic.
I was taught in catholic school that the entire bible was strictly literal as in everything in it happened exactly as it is written and it's a history book. This is, I'm sure you know, not remotely the catholic church's position. Another of my catholic school religion teachers was a creationist, which again is not the church's position. I'm thinking whoever taught you misunderstood, since part of transubstantiation is that no outward characteristics are changed, only the "substance". Any halfway intelligent priest would think you're crazy for thinking it's literally human meat and human blood because it specifically isn't. The whole thing is a deliberate nonsense contradiction but I've never met a catholic or a priest that would take that interpretation at all seriously.
Catholic religion teachers teach catechism incorrectly all the time, literally every one I've had has contradicted another. I have my understanding of transubstantiation from conversations with priests and franciscan friars. The whole concept requires that no physical change occurs. The essence or concept of the bread and wine are infused magically with Jesus divinity and his new covenant, it's a whole thing, but anyone genuinely thinking cannibalism is fundamentally misunderstanding an admittedly contradictory concept.
https://bustedhalo.com/ministry-resources/why-is-transubstantiation-not-considered-canibalism/
https://www.catholic.com/qa/can-transubstantiation-be-reasonably-taken-literally