this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
205 points (89.9% liked)

Technology

86580 readers
3248 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 85 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah but this one will actually not work as expected, shoot someone in the eye then gaslight you telling you it's your fault that you needed to buy more subscription credits for it to kinda work better

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The foundation of the system is its visual model, which Cheng trained on a custom mosquito dataset. To do that, he relied on a DSLR camera with a high-magnification zoom lens, capturing detailed images of mosquitoes for training data.

So, machine vision model. Cooler project, less clicky title.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

vision models is what truly broke the barrier. neil degrasse tyson likes to teplace the word "ai" with the generic term "computing". he made the point that before "ai" every advamcement in computing was just called computing. now we give this mystical reverence to this new tech and call it "ai". whether you hype it or hate it, you give it yok much power.

when adobe could remove an onject from a photo we said "cool tech" now its "ai". there really are cool fun tools buy its hard yo find people online to have a down to earth conversation about them. there are people offline i talk to but it would be cool to coolaborayr more

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it would be cool to coolaborayr more

This coolaborayion could have been an email

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I appreciate that

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Its unfortunate how big tech has hacked the word AI to mostly mean these LLM based chatbots or agents.

Even when LLMs are like tiny subset of AI technologies out there.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see what you did there, you hacker.

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Meant to say hijacked but I guess hacked is close enough.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

the one from 13 years was about killing flying mosquito and it was later turned out to be ~~fraud~~ (sorry original project wasn't a fraud but it never went into production see replies to this comment).

This uses equipment worth thousands of dollars to kill stationary mosquitos (standing on a white wall).

Maybe it works but it will not "wipe out" his mosquito problem. most mosquitos would be hanging out under your desk where your feet are.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[...] it was later turned out to be fraud.

Huh? That's news to me. Any source?

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i double checked after I saw your comment:

The original project "Photonic Fence" is real and theoretically work however it never turned into a product because it requires very expensive components to identify and kill a mosquito in the fraction of a second it passes in front of the device not to mention the risk of that laser reflecting on something and blinding a passing person.

However other products with same concept are for sale currently and those are the fraud.

I apologize for the misinformation in my original comment

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for checking

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 month ago

most mosquitos would be hanging out under your desk where your feet are.

Nooooo! No my feet!

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah why do the mosquitos go for feet >:(

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Much harder for you to kill
  2. under your desk is a safe dark place.
  3. Mosquito could wait there for you to come the next day
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 1 month ago

I think it's the smell. I remember some scientist did a experiment where he sat in a room full of mosquitoes and counted the bites to different parts of the body. He got most bites in the feet but when he washed them and tried the mosquitoes stopped attacking feet more than other body parts.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

They're kinda kinky like that >:)

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How exactly is a video about hacking into unsecured devices proof someone did this 13 years ago?

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Skip to 14:30 or something. It's a very disjointed talk.

AI in various forms has been around for a long time.