this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
111 points (96.6% liked)

memes

21667 readers
2310 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is what we do with spent fissile material

Well, I can't speak for other countries, but most of the nuclear waste generated in the USA has never reached any sort of permanent storage. Defense waste, from making nuclear weapons, is mostly stored in underground bunkers in two states.

How and where is nuclear waste stored in the U.S.?

Remnants of the chemical processing of radioactive material needed to manufacture nuclear weapons, often called “defense waste,” will eventually be melted along with glass, with the resulting material poured into stainless steel containers. These canisters are 10 feet tall and 2 feet in diameter, weighing approximately 5,000 pounds when filled.

For now, though, most of it is stored in underground steel tanks, primarily at Hanford, Washington, and Savannah River, South Carolina, key sites in U.S. nuclear weapons development. At Savannah River, some of the waste has already been processed with glass, but much of it remains untreated.

Waste from energy generation is almost all still stored above ground on site.

After about five years, the fuel bundles are removed, dried and sealed in welded stainless steel canisters. These canisters are still radioactive and thermally hot, so they are stored outdoors in concrete vaults that sit on concrete pads, also on the power plant’s property. These vaults have vents to ensure air flows past the canisters to continue cooling them.

As of December 2024, there were over 315,000 bundles of spent nuclear fuel rods in the U.S., and over 3,800 dry storage casks in concrete vaults above ground, located at current and former power plants across the country.

Even reactors that have been decommissioned and demolished still have concrete vaults storing radioactive waste, which must be secured and maintained by the power company that owned the nuclear plant.

...

A more permanent solution is likely years, or decades, away.

Not only must a long-term site be geologically suitable to store nuclear waste for thousands of years, but it must also be politically palatable to the American people. In addition, there will be many challenges associated with transporting the waste, in its containers, by road or rail, from reactors across the country to wherever that permanent site ultimately is.

Perhaps there will be a temporary site whose location passes muster with the Supreme Court. But in the meantime, the waste will stay where it is.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right. John Oliver did an LWT segment on nuclear waste and how we have an overflow problem at many local sites, and meanwhile can't get budgeting to complete the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. (It has some NIMBY problems, though it's one of the most stable regions to put a deep geological repository.

But the storage overflow problem is approaching critical in some places. The US may not have enough repositories for nuclear waste, but we need them badly.

In the current era, I do not expect this situation to improve, and may get worse, especially since the regime is against renewable energy development.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The NIMBY problems are not just for the storage location either. Nobody want nuclear waste trucked or shipped by rail through their region. Imagine if the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment had been carrying casks of nuclear waste.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While valid, the reason they're encased in those big concrete pillars is to assure they're safe for transport, and can survive accidents without leakage.

ETA: I should admit not ALL of our waste has been processed into vitrified HLW or packed for transport, but these processes are undergone before waste is shipped to a repository.