this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
1352 points (99.3% liked)

memes

21719 readers
3050 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I doubt that we'll be seeing UAVs for personal transport anytime soon. Terrestrial vehicles are significantly easier to manage.

The main thing that will prevent people from purchasing their own AVs will be availability. Waymo and Zoox, for example, are running services, not selling their multi-hundred-thousand-dollar vehicles to the general public. (I'm not bothering to address Tesla as their autonomy stack is an industry joke.)

Elimination of personal vehicles would make public transit more attractive; with the previously foregone conclusion that one must own a vehicle gone, the choice is between a few dollars for transit, or several times more than that for a private vehicle. How many people currently choose to take an Uber or Lyft to and from work?

Also, trains don't have curbside service.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

UAV meaning Unmanned Autonomous Vehicle. (In contrast to rideshare services, like Uber. When they were heavily subsidized, it must be noted, they increased traffic congestion.) Availability of them will increase. The reason that we have an auto-dominated landscape today is that car makers wanted to sell more cars. There's approximately 0% chance that car makers today will be satisfied selling a limited number of vehicles for ride services, when they could sell vastly more cars to individuals.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

UAV already stands for "unmanned aerial vehicle." Besides, using both "unmanned" and "autonomous" is redundant. Anyway, the standard abbreviation for autonomous vehicles is AV.

Buggy whip salesmen gonna have to deal with it.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I suppose a vehicle that is being driven by remote control is unmanned but not autonomous.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but an autonomous vehicle is by definition unmanned.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

An autonomous vehicle doesn't (in theory) require a driver, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have one.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well sure, that particular autonomous vehicle can't have a driver, but a Waymo Jaguar I-Pace could have a driver, and is also an autonomous car.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Well, it's a car with some fancy shit on it. Not sure if it can really be called an autonomous vehicle.