this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
723 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31081 readers
2620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think the problem here is people took:

Armed rebellion

As storming DC and something that ain't going to happen.

Calling the president a pedophile and the politicians who protect them is an act of rebellion

I'm just saying if we aren't openly armed, no one is gonna give a fuck what we say.

10k unarmed prosters get beaten and arrested all the time, no big deal.

Cops aren't going to start shit with 50 people with rifles and plates tho. Whether or not there's 10 people or 10k behind him them.

It's not a matter of how many people, it's how many rifles that makes power listen, or at least pass gun control like Reagan did.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s true, lots of states have stand your ground laws that absolutely would apply to the types of aggression cops show to protestors. Police know this, and almost certainly would be trying to keep the event peaceful.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Legality doesn't matter.

What matter is their method of handling protests is making people panicked, scared, and making them prioritizing avoiding immediate pain...

That literally only works on unarmed protesters, because a very large amount of people have an instinctual response to fight instead of flee. And if even one decides to fire on cops, the cops will all fire back and then so will all the armed protesters.

It's MAD, mutually assured destruction in the moment.

Because of that, and cops being cowards, they will not follow orders to escalate to violence against armed protests.

It's their only move, and AR15s and plate carriers take that away from them.

That's just the reality of it. Clever signs and logic won't help, we need to make them too scared to escalate to violence and being visibly armed is the only way to make them scared

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago

If you can't escalate to focused violence against political (or at least "politicized") targets, then your protest lacks moxie.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As storming DC and something that ain’t going to happen.

You mean the thing that literally happened in an attempt to overthrow a fair election just a handful of years ago? That was just a bunch of morons who cared more about some lies, surely there are enough rational people to overthrow for valid reasons.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Ah yes the simple storming of the Capitol that required dark money funding, coordinated agitator training and logistics (quite literally bussing people in for free), sabotage of security procedures, conspiracy to abduct and hold specific elected officials, and on and on...

AND IT STILL FAILED

Remind me again how a disorganized rabble of randoms will do better? Sheer moral purity?