this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
719 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30339 readers
1946 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

Ehh, that sounds over-engineered in my opinion, and reveals a lack of understanding of the organizational structure of the government. I understand you say it's an overhaul, but I think it stretches credulity a little too far.

Aside from the fact that it's unlikely to work as intended, it could also create a variety of unseen issues which may be even worse in the long run. Generally, large changes to the constitutional order need to be done with the utmost care. There's a good reason it would require supermajorities in both chambers, as well as the agreement of a supermajority of member states. That being said, it's not likely to gain that much support.

There are other more important changes that I think it would be better to focus on, which also have a greater chance of passing given enough support.

For instance, moving the Marshalls under the Judiciary is downright sensical; and as recent events make abundantly clear, necessary. Maybe even the entire DOJ, although putting prosecutors and sitting judges under the same authority might be dangerous.

We could add to that, giving Congress control over their own independent (and non-partisan; precisely how to achieve this would have to be worked out) security force.

Beyond that, we need electoral reform (ranked-choice voting and perhaps proportional representation), education reform (self-explanatory), healthcare reform (universal public healthcare, obviously), labor rights, consumer rights, the list goes on. Criminal justice reform as well. A lot of pieces of this pie, but that doesn't mean we need to turn it into a pretzel.

Oh and of course, overturning the Citizens United ruling, bringing back Net Neutrality and the Fairness Doctrine, and undoing so many other harmful rulings that have accrued over the decades since Nixon and Reagan.

Undoing the legacies of Reaganomics more broadly and returning to a more FDR-style economic system.

And of course a full-blown demagafication project, and not half-assed like Reconstruction either.