this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
1071 points (99.4% liked)
memes
21852 readers
1968 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
All I hear these days is either:
Never give the company anything because they'll never give anything to you
or
Work hard and you'll be noticed and climb the ladder.
Neither is inherently true.
You can be in a 'family' company where the next lazy AF 18 YO will be your next boss
You can be in a corporate meritocracy where your boss is an idiot and just stands on your shoulders without passing anything downhill.
If your company has upward momentum and your boss is both a decent and transparent human being, you can work hard and move up.
You can also work hard and succeed at projects and hop job to job with a strong resume (assuming the market isn't shit, like it is atm)
Know your boss.
Most companies are politically fiefdoms of a sort. This is by design. You're completely dependent on the benevolence of the management chain above you. This also explains why decadent or malicious management is nearly impossible to overcome without resorting to involving lawyers.
Absolutely. So the key is to understand the management chain above you and optimize that relationship. You either give them just enough that they would fire someone else first, or you make them dependent on you. Of course the real problem is when someone in the change swaps out from a benevolent manager to dick :)
Had this happen with a VP seat. The resignations that followed made the office look like ground-zero for an extinction-level event.
Probably moaning the whole time that people didn't want to work and they'd replace them all with better, cheaper people
Not something I would advise in today's world but I managed to make a decent living off one rule. Know the person paying me, it help ensure they know me and what I contribute.
My boss just bought me a new silverado 2500. But I also bust my ass of like your neighbors rented mule.
My current job i am underpaid. I am also underworked, and wfh. I may bitch at times but the absolute freedom this arrangement grants is wonderful
The age of the person isnt part of the problem. Literally, the boss could be any age and have knowledge and thoughtfulness to lead the company.
Generally, at 18 years old, you've not had any significant amount of time in managing people. You lack the experience to understand where the other workers are coming from and therefore any empathy you have for them is constructed from an inexperienced world view. While not impossible to be a natural born leader at 18, most are emotionally and intellectually ill-equipped to handle day to day problems at arise on the workplace. In context, this 18 year old was placed into this position, not because of their natural born leadership and excellent negotiation tactics, but rather because the family needs to groom them to take over the business. In my decidedly greater than 18 year old experience, those situations do not breed strong leaders and those that are under them generally suffer. In your late 20's to early 30's, given the appropriate opportunities to work in management, many can thrive. It's not ageism, it's just that maturity and experience does play a significant role in being able to lead others, especially when it comes to others that aren't particularly good at taking orders or producing work without close supervision.
The thing is, age doesnt equate experience. At 18 you can certainly be mature and experienced; Its really a gross over-simplication to state otherwise.
But I do agree that the person has been placed most probably out of consent to upheld the family tradition. Otherwise, that person has every capacity to have that emotional intelligence - just how older people can have less.