this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
468 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

86387 readers
3220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 334 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Almost nobody is willing to buy one

repairability enthusiasts have bought Framework laptops in the hundreds of thousands

Pick a lane there, XDA...

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 122 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They even mention how the point is to buy the whole laptop once and then upgrade or repair it, instead of buying an entirely new laptop. Of course they're selling fewer laptops than anyone making mediocre netbooks

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But that’s not that easily quantifiable so it’s bad /s

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago

MBAs in a nutshell

[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 18 points 1 week ago
[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Their argument is that only enthusiasts want these laptops, but an average customer doesn't care about them.

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And I don't see why that is a problem. If a company is doing good thing and sustaining itself, I don't see why they will need to be the next dell, hp, or lenovo. That feels like the toxicity of "endless growth" in the capitalistic view of the world.

Not to mention in most of the place I go to, these are the most popular laptops only behind macbooks. In many situations, they are even more popular than macbooks.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have never seen a Framework in the wild, however I applaud their approach, but even when taking repair costs in consideration, Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop and using the old laptop for some other purpose. I can't imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive, but I hope they do, I wish other manufacturers would make repair a higher priority.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My anecdotal experience - my Asus gaming laptop died about 6 months ago. with a lot of trouble shooting, I determined it was most likely the mobo. I decided to go with a framework, and was able to bring over my hard drive and ram, saving me like $400.

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You also likely don't need to reinstall/resetup everything, which is absolutely painful.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Getting the framework driver's was painful. I needed to download them over wifi, but wifi wasn't working because it needed the driver. okay, download on another computer and install via USB, nope. USB drivers aren't working either. I ended up spotting my hard drive into my desktop, downloading the drivers that way, and then moving it back to the framework laptop to install.

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you have a desktop with internet connection, maybe a USB stick would suffice?

There is also USB tethering from a phone that could work.

I am not defending framework. They should try to do better (maybe windows is the bottleneck? not sure). Just offering solutions to people who might encounter this problem later.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They said the USB ports didn’t work as they didn’t have the drivers.

oh Sorry, bad at reading comprehensions :(

[–] webhead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've literally never had a computer need drivers to make basic USB work in the past probably 20 years. I had a bleeding edge ai 350 framework right even when it came out. Linux was a little flaky with my sound but everything else worked. Same in Windows. Maybe I needed Wi-Fi drivers, don't recall, but I know USB worked without any. I'm really curious how you needed USB drivers of all things genuinely. I mean you installed the OS presumably from a thumb drive so how would that not work in the same os after installing? Lol.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It may be a separate issue to drivers, because I have this other issue where after waking up from sleep, I have to either reboot or physically remove the USB port and plug it back in to make the USB work. I've disabled "allow windows to put this device to sleep" for every single USB titled thing in device manager, so I'm not sure what the issue is. I plan on installing a small linux partition at some point to play around and see if I like it.

[–] webhead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you really moved the hard drive from one laptop to another without reinstalling the OS, that's probably going to cause issues. It'll "work" seemingly but it's gonna be messy like this. You're going to spend more time hunting weird shit than you would just doing a reinstall imo.

I'd backup what you need to and start over or you're probably going to keep having strange issues.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I took the working hard drive, OS and all, from my previous laptop and slotted into the framework. No OS installation needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would like to offer a slightly different perspective: I believe framework is uniquely positioned to survive the ram apocalypse (at least respect to their scale).

In the sense that, framework user can keep purchasing and upgrading components, like battery, screen, speaker, hinge, expansion card, without needing to worry about ram prices, and framework can profit from these component without needing to subsidize ram prices.

That being said, as a smaller company, they certainly don't have the same amount of bargaining power on ram as most big players, and the launch of LPCAM2 is a bit risky, since that pervents people from purchasing new ram/board/laptops given the current ram prices.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Does a new generation mobo/chip combination generally still support the older generation of RAM?

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, not on intel core ultra 3 unfortunately (unless you have LPCAMM2 lying around, which is unlikely), that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

That's what I get for only reading 2/3 of your comment before responding.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop

They're absolutely not.

can't imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive

Being that you can and have been able to buy them without RAM or storage, I'd say they're better-positioned than anyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why does everything need to cater to the average consumer? The average consumer is a fucking idiot, especially when it comes to technology. They don't need to sell to everyone, they just need to sell enough to keep their company running and their people paid.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I feel this way about spicy things. Everything "hot" is just hot to the average schmuck from the Midwest. Anything spicier than that gets dumbed down to become that (like taco bell Diablo sauce) or becomes hard to find.

I really enjoyed when that Buldak 2x spicy chicken raman "challenge" became a thing, because that's some great tasting raman and more in line with the normal amount of spicy I like to eat. Now I'm back to having to just order it online again.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can order the sauce separately too. I love that Buldak spicy carbonara stuff.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

I totally have some! But man, it's kind of pricey for what it is. Not saying I don't spend more on most of the hot sauces I buy, but still.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In my part of the world 2x is weak, the challenges were doing 3x 😂

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never seen 3x, but I've gotten the 4x before. It wasn't much hotter than the 2x, really.

At some point, your tongue is numb anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

With laptop making, that’s a lot though. Economies of scale are a huge factor there.

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Comes from the corporate mindset where only growth is good. Just existing as a company that's makes stuff for a small group of people is somehow 'incorrect' to these crazy people.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

How many laptops are enterprise purchases as well? Those dont get fixed.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

It may be, but that doesn't resemble what they said. Presumably that is a less clickbaity headline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So few that if you order one now you only have to wait til October to get it.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, what is hundreds of thousands as a percentage of the overall market? Like if they sold hundreds of thousands of grains of rice, that's "almost nothing" compared to the rest of the rice that got sold

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Most of the market" includes the segments of commercial support contracts for office laptops which Framework doesn't even target. Then you have the next biggest which is "go to Costco/Walmary/bestbuy and get what is on sale. So Framework simply cannot be a majority brand without those.

Among the remaining segment, e.g., developers that get to shop around and buy whatever they want? Its fairly popular.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t understand what you mean in your first point. There are clear pathways for companies and schools to buy in bulk on the framework website. Not saying that FW is successful in that way but it is there.

I agree on your second point but would tie it to marketing. Having your laptop on sale at Costco is a marketing strategy, which for better or for worse, FW doesn’t do right now (and probably doesn’t have the ability to do)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In no context is hundreds of thousands of people "almost nobody".

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, Dell is the #3 in laptop sales and sells roughly 30 million laptops per year. So yeah, Framework is roughly 0% of market share. I know this is a very tech enthusiast heavy website, but there are certain realities that people should face. It's like saying Nothing Phone is going to remotely compete with Apple. It's not a fair or valid comparison in the first place. I think a more fair comparison for Framework (beyond what they are hoping to achieve) would be with a small system builder like System 76, XMG or the likes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

XDA is pretty much slop these days.

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't know they existed, so that might be a factor too. Need some better advertising

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Advertising is expensive as hell. Probably not a huge budget. The products kinda sell themselves in the right circles.