this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
278 points (99.3% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/h9ihE

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 139 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (10 children)

The gathering, which is scheduled to take place Tuesday, was described as a “pep rally.” But bringing hundreds of generals to Quantico, including those stationed abroad, could prove to be an extremely expensive pep talk.

There's absolutely nothing the military in general hates more than this shit, and there's nothing high ranking officers specifically hate more than being treated like common soldiers.

This isn't going to inspire loyalty, it's going to turn the top brass against this administration for various reasons.

They're just pissing off everyone

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

One of the most expensive "this could have been an email" meeting

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I truly hope you are right, but I am extremely concerned that this will be a power grab, having the generals swear an oath of loyalty to the Trump regime directly, rather than than the normal oath they may have sworn.

Doing this would make it extremely easy to take over and purge the leadership of disloyalty to the regime.

The situation is very precarious at the moment.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The correct reaction would be for the generals to fulfill their real oath to the Constitution and immediately depose Hegseth and the rest of the Trump regime as the domestic enemies they are.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's basically the only scenario I can see on the table where normality even has a chance to return in our lifetime. The military would have to clean house on both sides of the aisle though, force primaries for everything, and basically flush the toilet on the last 150 years of party politics.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can never go back in time. Better to think of what ideals would be typified by a new revolutionary spirit.

[–] J92@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. At some point the meeting will end, and Hegseth will leave, and the generals will just be in a room together, talking about how shit hegseth is.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

And at some point, someone is going to address the elephant in the room, and say "I signed up to protect America from Nazis, not help the Nazis take over. This has got to end. NOW," and a lot of others are going to agree.

And two things will happen: They will rise up and take America back, or they will be removed from their positions, and give the American Resistance extremely strong and experienced military leadership for the rebellion.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I hope so, but the way things are going, I doubt it.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not even normal soldiers, but as decoration. They’ll be there to make him look good, for “optics”, and will serve the same function as furniture and wall art. All for a talk that is about army fitness and not anything requiring terribly delicate security?

If they have any self-respect they’ll be talking amongst eachother right now saying the same shit and deciding not to go. Besides, if security is the reason they should all be gathered then security is also the reason why that’s a terrible idea.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They think all these Generals are on their side, but Generals value competence and loyalty, and they know what Treason looks like.

These MAGA dumbfucks haven't realized that they are gathering ALL the military high command together, so they can start their military uprising.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they know what Treason looks like.

That's fucking hilarious. These same generals are perfectly okay with deploying troops against American citizens in Portland.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How do you know that? How do you know that they haven't been stewing like the rest of us, slowly getting hotter and hotter?

Now they get to meet with their peers, and find out they've ALL been thinking the same things, and they want to come up with a plan.

Frankly, that scenario is as plausible as the one in which they toss away every military dream they ever had, to be recorded in history as the weakass generals who let the Nazis take over the world.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The president just said he told Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that “we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military,” referring to urban areas within the United States."

If there is no coup now, our military leadership is 100% on board with killing US citizens. They would be just as bad as the "weakass generals who let the nazis take over".

Let's see what happens, shall we?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump and Hegseth would have no trouble ordering the military to fire on American citizens, they are confirmed psychopaths. I'm not convinced that the majority of Generals would follow that rule. I suspect that MOST would not.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I admire your optimism. I suspect that the vast majority of them would open fire on american babies if Trump told them to.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

How do I know?

I've been paying attention.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Here's hoping they let their feelings be known in no uncertain terms. I'm sure they won't though if they want to keep their jobs.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I'd love to see the facial expressions on the Marines generals as he tells them how to be better Marines.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Hegseth will tell them real good. I'm sure his credibility will go a long ways with them. Especially when he shows his tattoos, and starts rubbing it on that his tats are bigger than their tats. Marines love that shit.

Then they'll take him out for beers, get him really drunk, and beat the shit out of him in the alley behind the bar.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago

Okay ❤️

Yay ❤️

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it’s going to turn the top brass against this administration

Are you fucking kidding? US top brass fucking loves this shit. Fascist pep rally on the taxpayers dime, it just doesn't get any better.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

oh, I'm sorry, i didn't know you had more experience with the military and high level officers...

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"The president just said he told Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that “we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military,” referring to urban areas within the United States."

If there is no coup now, every united states military officer at this gathering is 100% on board with being deployed on US soil against US citizens.

Let's see what happens, shall we?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using "military leadership" to refer to a single political appointte is fucking ridiculous.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Edited for accuracy. Are you beginning to understand? Or are you gonna keep playing military apologist?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Love that for them.