this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
473 points (95.2% liked)

memes

22014 readers
4103 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's kind of how photographs work, isn't it? They exist as a moment in time without context. Anything we say or think about this one is framed by our own experiences and feelings. That's part of what makes it a powerful medium - the viewer is left to consider everything that led to this moment and what happened afterward.

All the OP is saying is that this particular moment in time reflects something that they believe is important to raising a child. As a dad of 3, I agree. You indulge their interests, you treat them as humans, you try your best to teach them about the world.

That doesn't mean I think the family in this photo is doing everything right - just that in this one moment, they did something good for their kid.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

just that in this one moment, they did something good for their kid

We don't even know that. For all we know, the kid hates Pokemon but the parents thought their costume idea was too cute to skip. To your point, this photo shows exactly what the viewer projects into it, and that is not necessarily good parenting.

(Also, that's not how most photos exist. Context is supremely important to most photography, because otherwise that photo of Thích Quảng Đức is just an album cover that goes hard.)

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

For all we know that kid was kidnapped and forced to wear a costume to make it less obvious.

We can speculate a million terrible things, or we can choose to say "aww" that's cute and move on.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm not saying people can't think it's cute. Parents dress their kids up as all sorts of shit because they think it's cute. I'm saying that dressing your kid up is not objectively good parenting. That kid didn't buy those outfits. The parents made them dress up. Maybe the kid wanted to and was excited about it, maybe not. But nothing about this image is inherently "doing parenting right."

Take away that text and I cease having an opinion on this photo, but the comments piling on that this is what parenting should look like without context or explanation are reinforcing the idea that children are dolls to be dressed and shown off like toys. Denying children autonomy because you want a cute Christmas card isn't necessarily a good thing.