this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
70 points (94.9% liked)
People Twitter
10209 readers
1177 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tolerance ends with the intolerant. I would not protect Tate from any of the harm he inflicted upon others.
An eye for an eye is rarely a good exchange rate.
If I ever become Supreme Ruler of Earth, I'll make this phrase literal.
What if they have better eyes than me? What if it's my chance at better vision? Do they even need to read??
... Gimme eyes pls.
GIMME FUEL, GIMME FIRE, GIMME EYES WHICH I DESIRE!
Tate is getting what none of his victims got: due process and a chance at reform. Part of that process is going to be forming Empathy, a word meaning "to suffer together with others".
Why would his victims need that? They're not the ones who need due process or have reason to reform. 🤨
In this case it is inferred as a chance at freedom. Tate was a human trafficker, his victims were slaves.
Short reply? No.