588
Mitch McConnell’s staff refuse to answer basic questions on his health
(www.the-independent.com)
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
588 points (99.7% liked)
politics
30517 readers
2992 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because of McConnell's own fuckery with Kentucky law regarding filling vacant offices, in 2021 and again in 2024, the legal question is unclear. Gov. Beshear has been very open about it lately, saying, "We're looking at everything," when pressed about what legal option(s) he may take.
To answer your question directly, he could try to get a judge to rule requiring McConnell's presence or personal answer, but that would require being able to demonstrate a legal necessity on behalf of the state, which seems self-evident but which he may not actually have in law. During the first month he was also been reluctant to unduly publicize McConnell's "private health" issues, but his patience is gone and he is no longer holding back.
It's also pretty clear that the governor could simply declare the seat vacant, pointing to McConnell's prolonged absence as proof and call the special election anyway, just to force the matter, but that's not as simple as it seems either, because even if a vacancy becomes apparent, with or without McConnell's cooperation or disclosure, the legal question is far from settled.
From before Kentucky was a state (it was part of the commonwealth of Virginia under royal charter), the governor had the right and the power to fill vacant offices, and did so without issue. Upon statehood, that right of the governor to fill vacant seats with the candidate of his choosing was codified into the Kentucky state constitution. Until recently, a federal seat has been included in that right and power.
But in 2021, when McConnell's health started to fail, he had the Kentucky state legislature enact a law that required the governor to select his own replacement from a shortlist of three candidates supplied to him by the state legislature.
Apparently that wasn't good enough for McConnell, and in 2024 he had the Kentucky state legislature change the law again, this time requiring that the governor make no replacement choice for his own seat at all, but rather call a special election -- unless that vacancy occurs within three months of a regular election, in which case the seat will just remain vacant until the candidate elected in November fills the vacancy in January. That's what the August 3 date people are throwing around is about: it's the three-month-prior to the regular Kentucky election date in November.
The problem here is that none of these recent laws have been tested, AND they directly contradict the Kentucky state constitution: meaning that whatever the governor does, there will be legal challenges.
Meaning that all these people in this thread calling out what they think is the obvious stupidity/ignorance of other people in the thread are exactly that themselves, because they have missed the most obvious thing of all and what the governor himself has been pointing out repeatedly: literally NO ONE knows what will happen now.
And that is likely what McConnell meant to accomplish: all along he wanted to ensure that should his health fail, a Dem governor could not appoint his interim replacement, and legally that is all but certain just because no matter what happens, the legal challenges will likely run out the clock.
It doesn't matter what the laws says, call their bluff, and force MAGA to sue. If the judge throws it out without forcing proof of life, they are going to have a LOT of explaining to do when they finally announce his death after August 4. It will prove that they committed perjury in court.
It's not me you have to convince, but yeah. For myself, I personally think McConnell's been dead since the day 911 was called, and he's either being artificially sustained or they're actively hiding the death. If some judge starts calling that out it's going to be hot in August for a number of those complicit in whatever's going on with McConnell in reality.
But I'm not the governor of Kentucky, and I honestly don't have any idea which way Beshear is leaning. It's inconvenient for Kentucky but he may actually decide it's in Kentucky's best interest to let McConnell's machinations continue to rob the Senate of another Republican vote.