this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
619 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30711 readers
1757 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Need to send out more photos like a kidnapping victim from the 1980s holding today’s newspaper. Should use a Polaroid this time to make it really authentic. Maybe a note with some letters cut out from a skateboarding magazine. Someone can wait at a payphone at the mall next to Spencer’s for an anonymous landline call with further instructions.

Man I really miss Orange Julius.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly it's the fact that the paper was there that sells me for it. Like whoever took or doctored or made that photo was like "no we have to include the paper, nobody is going to believe us if we don't" but if they really wanted us to believe them they'd make a statement. Which means that it wasn't a good faith photo, they deliberately did their best to trick us by making it "as believable as we can"

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I like how everyone stopped to argue whether or not it was todays paper, but no one stopped to ask, why the fuck would they do that?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s why it’s so funny. It’s like a parody of what these out of touch assholes think a proof of life photo would be, in 2026. When everyone has a video recording device in their hand at all times. It’s comically not credible (even if real.)

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. They know what they're doing. Nobody thinks he's some "spring chicken". He's old as dirt and he freezes in public all the time. If he didn't look nearly dead then they'd do a 30 second video of him saying "hello everyone I'm getting better" but they aren't. If he was really sitting in that chair with the paper and coherent then they'd let him be coherent.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It really was a tasty treat.