this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
709 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41022 readers
4101 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn’t Piefed adding code to block people from upvoting and downvoting too much? If they’re on Lemmy a lot they might not appreciate that kind of restriction, especially if they post a lot of content.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I haven't seen anything of the sort, personally. A while back the larger Piefed instance was "shadowbanning" instances they don't promote, but instance owners are free to do as they wish.

There is an "upvote quota" but I've personally never hit it so I don't know what happens when you do, I kind of doubt a regular human could unless they made it their full time job.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah he's talking about the upvote quota. Everybody gets one, visible on the profile, resets daily.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, and like he points out, as a frequent poster he often engages low-key with the people who comment on his posts with upvotes. So this really made it hard to engage for him.

Regardless it’s a shit decision by the admin. Everyone on Lemmy gets one upvote/downvote per post they interact with. It’s not as if you can upvote or downvote a post multiple times (unless you go though multiple accounts, which that stupid rule wouldn’t fix anyways), so who cares if some people are upvoting or downvoting more than others? That just means they’re on Lemmy more, which is fine.

So it’s a shit rule for something that isn’t a problem, and doesn’t address a possible adjacent problem (making lots of puppet accounts to push personal agendas) that could actually be an issue. That admin is just an idiot and an ass. I don’t blame Pug for leaving.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I can see it being useful if, for example, a group of machines downvoted enough to be a major influence but not enough to trigger bot detection algorithms. In general, decentralized platforms are much less capable of dealing with such attacks, whereas Reddit (before the company went public and the owner sold out to AI) was identifying and banning millions of bots a month using largescale and complex methods which would be impossible at a smaller scale.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But again, that’s a group. It doesn’t trigger over an entire instance, it triggers only on individual accounts. So it would do absolutely nothing against an issue like that, as I pointed out.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It will trigger each individual account and therefor the entire group. There is an easy workaround if they used more accounts but I'm assuming they already used the maximum number of accounts they could get away with if they were botting.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No? Again, one account, one vote per comment. Each account votes once, on one person’s comment, isn’t going to trigger shit.

If anything, making a ton of puppet accounts and having only some vote in rotation to push your agenda would be the best way to get around it. So it encourages a problem while claiming to fix a problem that isn’t there.

Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

At the end of the day each account now has a limit that most humans will never notice, whereas before they could perform as many actions as they desired. It's the difference between infinite and a very large but clearly limited number.

And if those automated systems hit their limit because the botter issued instructions for them to vote past their limit, then it becomes suspicious behavior which can be used to identify them. Especially true when the botter is part of network utilizing a shared pool of automated accounts.

Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.

To be clear, in this particular thread we're discussing a PieFed feature, not Lemmy.

Now, I do agree it should be configurable and toggleable by the instance owners, but I see value in the feature.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but PugJesus hosted all his stuff on Pifed. That’s why he left; it was just too much to move.

And again, if he was hitting it regularly, just a regular Lemmy content creator, that limit was way too fucking low.

And again, since the limit is well-displayed, it’s not hard to get around it.

So it’s fucking stupid.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Again you keep saying Lemmy, that's wrong. That isn't Lemmy. Lemmy is the one run by red fascist tankie genocidal anti-trans maniacs.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Sorry. I tend to use Lemmy as another stand-in for fediverse, same as people say Kleenex for facial tissues.

But you still seem to think this ban on interacting too much with people is a good thing, which I just can’t fathom.

No-one can vote on a post more than once, and the votes are meaningless anyways. Plus, the more content and interactions, the better the fediverse is. So why stop people from voting to their heart’s content? The admin even flat-out said he thought too much interaction in the fediverse was a bad thing, which is like… that’s why we’re here? To interact with people?