this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
1234 points (98.4% liked)

Funny

15736 readers
666 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Their constitution is a divine document, dictated by the elder gods which cannot be altered in any way (including the amendments, oddly enough) and which can solve any problem and contains every truth.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Also the sort of person who shouts that the loudest, will happily go along with any suggestion that the amendments they don't like were a corruption of the true spirit of the Constitution and should be repealed.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

American civil religion

American civil religion is a sociological theory that a nonsectarian civil religion exists within the United States with sacred symbols drawn from the national history of the United States. Scholars have portrayed it as a common set of values that foster social and cultural integration. The ritualistic elements of ceremonial deism found in American ceremonies and presidential invocations of God can be seen as expressions of the American civil religion.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I've always thought of this as being very bizarre and I don't know if something similar has ever emerged in another country so far.

The US has birthed lots of very weird ideas.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

And the founding fathers were divinely inspired geniuses who thought of every possible contingency, despite being a bunch of 20 year old rich kids.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 20 hours ago

And can be ignored by the very same government whenever it chooses to do so.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Applying bible rules to the Constitution.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Actually that's incorrect in terms of the "cannot be altered". The constitution can be altered via a ratification by 38 / 50 states or 2/3rds of congress. With a supermajority being required, this would mean that the proposed amendment would have to be bipartisan.. Which means it's almost impossible to do, especially nowadays... Unless the country were to take a major shift left or right (or more likely the elections become rigged)

Last time this happened though was in 1992

thank goodness because if it was too easy, the "two terms" would have been amended already by the Party of Trump

No wonder he wants to "federalize elections." Just look what's been happening in Nicaragua since 2013 which has finally come to a head (although Ortega's judges just straight up nullified the term limit....

On paper the USA SCOTUS cannot do this since they can only interpret ...but they can take away teeth to enforce which they have done before.. they just can't straight up say "nah that' part of the constitution is nullified." Like what happened in Nicaragua in 2013

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

I mean, they've already reinterpreted parts of the Constitution to not mean exactly what it says. They can wordsmith their way around the 22nd amendment if enough of them find politically advantageous. I'm sure Alito has a draft ruling already ready to go.