this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
1620 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1526 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

remember folks: the entire problem is capitalism. it can literally all be solved by dismantling capitalism and …undismantling some guillotines.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now you have upgraded to a more limited number of rich assholes with even more concentrated power. Oh wait, a couple of decades later they reintroduce capitalism too.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's unclear that is inevitable, but it does seem to be a common result of State socialism.

In libertarian socialism, hoarding resources will be recognized as an attack on the commons that can be answered with an attack (by the people) on the hoarder.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How in the world is that going to be policed?

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In libertarian socialism, the people are the police. There's no States, so no state-organized and state-privileged police force. I could be wrong though, I still need a lot of education around libertarian socialism; I'm very much used to Capitalism.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That makes no sense. How are a bunch of vigilantes going to be accountable to the rest of society?

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe this will help: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-full#text-amuse-label-seci58

I haven't internalized all of it yet.

I think this is the most direct answer:

Simply put, if people impose themselves by force on others then “they will be the government” and “we will oppose them with force” for “if today we want to make a revolution against the government, it is not in order to submit ourselves supinely to new oppressors.” [Malatesta, Op. Cit., p. 99] This applies to defending a free society against organised counter-revolution and against those within it conducting anti-social (“criminal”) activities. The principle is the same, it is just the scale which is different.

The "bunch of vigilantes" will be accountable to the people because they will be the people. They will act to reject anti-social activities, re-educate people that chose to do anti-social acts (so they have a pro-social understanding), and remediate any harms due anti-social activities.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Do you think that under State socialism that copyrights will exist and be enforced?

Who/what exactly would grant OR enforce copyrights under libertarian socialism?

Capitalism is a problem, but is not quite parallel with IP rights/protections.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Am I misunderstanding something here??? Copyright needn't exist under socialism because under socialism artists wouldn't be dependent on the legal fiction of "intellectual property" to make a living.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Without copyright, what LLMs raiding the creative output of whoever (including by destroying and scanning books), and reproducing it, even exactly, wouldn't have any legal restrictions, but neither would overt piracy.

It would be a very different world. So, depending on what you think is "wrong" with one of the listed activities but not the other, it might be solved by eliminating IP (as part of overthrowing Capitalism or otherwise). Also, the current private justifications of those behaviors would no longer acquiring or obtaining capital, but that doesn't mean people wouldn't pursue those behaviors for other justifications.

I think in a socialist world, a great many artists will still find themselves working to make a living; they will work for the community instead of the Capitalists, but there will still be work to be done, and art may not keep your belly full in lean times. But, I also have problems imagining a socialist world.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

i think also state socialism would be a problem, yes.