this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
831 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86879 readers
4100 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Great. So what do I use instead?

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Continue using Wikipedia. They don't run ads so traffic doesn't translate to revenue for them. Just don't donate and their server costs will become unsustainable once they run out of cash in about 20 years

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia itself is still one of the best resources on the internet, and they actually make it pretty easy to back up their data, which is why there are so many clones out there.

If Wikimedia foundation died, somebody else would take over, and hopefully the quality wouldn't decline too much.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Reputability and reliability will absolutely take a deep dive.

The greatest asset of Wikipedia is not the trove of data (I have the copy on my computer), but efficient moderation, neutrality, and trust.

None of the clones are nearly as trusted, as they're edited at a whim of whoever owns them, or simply poorly moderated.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Don't abandon Wikipedia over this, if it's useful it's useful (though it shouldn't be overrated). Do reconsider donating to Wikimedia Foundation, since the money apparently can be spent even on union-busting.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

as others have said, don’t necessarily stop using wikipedia & related tools (wiktionary, etc). they’re still useful and using them doesn’t directly benefit the foundation.

however, if the union calls for an editorial strike (no more editing) or a full-on boycott, follow what they say, out of solidarity. it’s what i plan on doing. in general, i think this is the best reaction to union busting: follow what the union says.

and yea, stop donating if you’re doing that.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your local library? I've been trying to get in the habit of borrowing non-fiction books from my friend Anna.

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does she have an archive or what?

Something like that. She's a very generous person.