Funny

15794 readers

796 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

670

How corporate AI adoption is going (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They're literally solving problems that humans haven't been able to.

If you actually read instead of continuing to spam bullshit you would know this isn't true.

You say "haven't been able to". This is fucking false my dude. At best it's solved problems humans haven't been bothered to solve yet. The solutions already existed and it assembled them into a proof.

I don't really know what AGI means

You don't know what any of this means dawg. You are literally just saying shit that you heard other people say.

[–] TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works -2 points 16 hours ago

OK bro. I guess you can solve 130 year old equations? Or maybe this is a weird way of measuring intelligence anyways and I was just demonstrating that they're capable of executing novel concepts, which they clearly are if they're solving things no one has solved before. Like do you not get how that is the important part? Not that humans can't solve it, it's that we HAVEN'T. The AI, on it's own, managed to solve a novel problem. We did not teach it to solve that problem. We taught it HOW to solve that problem, and then it did. And I was just using math because people say that it's bad at math when it no longer is. It's good at reasoning, it can come up with novel concepts. IDK. This feels like, "AI is whatever isn't."

I'm honestly asking you what your benchmark would be, because I'm sitting here saying maybe and IDK and I wonder and you're here stating things very rigidly, but somehow I'm the one being accused of having ideological blinders? Mate I asked you what they were bad at now and you just ranted instead. But I'm the unreasonable one unwilling to listen. Okay. Have a nice night, homie.