this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
715 points (95.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41337 readers
4323 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

100% they have a class based system it's just not talked about.

They do have a bourgeoisie class and a peasent class.

They have doctors, lawyers, construction workers, government employees, billionaires and unprecedented wealth within families.

Then they have the peasant class the rice paddy farmers, the package sorters, the food delivery drivers, the minimum income workers living in cramped apartments and the unemployed.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

100% they have a class based system it's just not talked about.

It's literally on their flag though. Those stars aren't just decoration, they stand for the peasants, workers, petite bourgeois and national bourgeois, unified and led by the big star: the communist party, and its allies.

China is a people's republic, which historically would mean that those various class strata would be represented in government, by various parties and mass organizations. Not just a single communist party (see, East Germany, Socialist Poland, or the early DPRK). As China has developed its productive forces, however, a decision was made to allow the Bourgeoisie to be an element within the communist party itself, so they couldn't form their own separate base of political power. While that brings contradictions, they're far more manageable than they would be otherwise.

They're pretty open about all of this.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, that’s why it’s not communist. But it is socialist, because the working class controls the government and holds the reins of the economy.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The 200 million rural farmers control the country!

No wait, the 400 million service workers control the country!

No wait, it is the 500 million middle class that control the country!

No wait, it is the 130,000 of the wealthy class that controls the country!

No wait, it is the 320 billionaires that control the country!

No wait, it is the 2,878 Congressional members that control the country!

No wait, it is seven leaders who control the country!

No wait, it is Xi who controls the country!

wacky shit, aint it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, exactly like the working class in the US controls the government and holds the reins of the economy.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except not. Tell me more about how ignorant you are about political economy theory and how China actually functions.

ohhhhhhhhhhh it’s evolved. I’m going off of an old system:

Class structure and earnings

In the last half century, China’s class structure has undergone a major transformation, evolving from a simple system of three socialist strata (cadres, workers, and peasants) in the pre-reform era to a hybrid class system mixing capitalist features with aspects of the previous socialist class system. The Chinese market-oriented reforms and the expansion of the private sector changed property relations and generated a class structure with striking similarities to that of other capitalist societies (Bian Citation2002). Previous research has adopted multiple approaches to understand the class dynamics and earnings in transitional China. Some research on urban China applies Goldthorpe’s neo-Weberian class theory to the Chinese context (Zou Citation2015) while others have adapted Wright’s neo-Marxist class framework to explain class-based earnings inequality (Li, Qin, and Chen Citation2012; Lin and Wu Citation2009). Lin and Wu (Citation2009) compared different class schema and concluded that a modified neo-Marxian class approach (albeit one that incorporated hukou) best captured the evolving class structure in transitional China. They also demonstrated that class has become the major source of earnings disparities among Chinese workers.

Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21620555.2021.1878019#d1e358

Hukou: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hukou

Hukou is incorporated into almost every Chinese socioeconomic and political system