this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
664 points (99.7% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3025 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I'm curious why the GOP seems to be actively pursuing a shutdown right now, that they have full trilateral control over the Federal Government. Trump already isn't bothering to staff or govern the administrations they don't like, it seems like this would only hamper their goals with ICE & DHS, right?

Is there even an actual goal here? Or are they betting on Schumer et al caving at the last possible nanosecond?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They will not furlough workers, they will fire en masse. USA lost 32000 private sector jobs last quarter, tariff economics is working!

The goal is to cull federal workers.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Grover Norquist, who founded Americans for Tax Reform in 1985 at the urging of President Reagan, declared in 2001: “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”

https://theconversation.com/the-shutdown-drowning-government-in-the-bathtub-111333

They are ideologically opposed to the government doing basically anything other than police and military duties, and having the bare minimum legal system required to facilitate criminal convictions for the poor, and the contract emforcement of private business.

Basically, they want the level of government that exists in Night City from Cyberpunk 2077, but probably without mass transit or even public roads.

This is what Rush Limbaugh's ditto hesds have been told they want for about 40 years, and now they are just doing it.

You can prosecute people for thought crimes snd not being the right sexuality or religion or skin color with this, so, that's all good with them.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue they also want the government to collect money from taxpayers and distribute it to the rich in the form of subsidies and contracts.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I mean, in practical terms, yes, but they will argue amongst themselves as to exactly the specifics, or if they go full libertarian and axe as much of that as possible.

See the current situation of US Farmers.

Basically all their direct subsidies have been decimated, SNAP got decimated and that was a huge indirect subsidy for farmers.

They will probably keep subsidizing the fuck out of oil and gas, but when you get to full fascism, it becomes much less formal and much more arbitrary, impulsive, less well defined, more 'what have you done for me lately' style corruption.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm aware of this, it's just that shutting the federal government down right now wouldn't seem to help in that goal. They're in the middle of a ramp-up of ICE & federal troop deployments across our cities. That's going to get a lot harder it those soldiers aren't getting a paycheck, no?

Sitting on it, I think the claims that they'll fire workers, all the other vague claims they've made, is all just a bluff to get Democrats to cave-into their demands, weakening the opposition and legitimizing their deconstruction.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

As best I can tell, ICE / DHS considers 93% of its employees to be essentially personnel and has said themselves almost all of them will still be paid.

Because they are 'critical law enforcement.'

Beyond that, the Trump admin has already proven they have no problem illegally withholding and redirecting funds.

So... regardless of who is actually responsible for a shutdown, we are existing in a de facto dictatorship unless some other element of the government actually does something to stop this.

They literally do not care about laws.

Coincidentally, I'll just here note that one of the monikers of the AntiChrist is 'the lawless one'.

Not that I am religious anymore, nor do I think most Republicans actually read their Bibles, but it is kind of funny.

But uh yes, it is obviously a bluff, they will blame everything on Dems and illegal immigrants and the queer no matter what actually happens, because they are literally psychotically delusional.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That seems like the best analysis I've seen. In general, you can always assume behind every action is "The worst" as their goals and intentions.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Well thank you lol.

Yes, this, making internet comments, this is why I got an Econ degree and a Poli Sci degree, apparently.

Would have been neat if anyone listened to anything I was saying, in a professional or personal capacity, for the last 20ish years, but uh, nope, nope, so now we get fascism and economic collapse, and I get to be way, way too sullen to eek out an 'I told you so'.

Holy shit this all sucks so much.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago

Police...but not corruption or fraud.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

They're betting on Democrats getting the blame. They might be right, though I hope not.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

This still serves their larger goal of portraying all of government (potentially representing the will of the people to some degree) as inefficient and unreliable. This furthers simplistic "strongman" attitudes, as well as the continued push for deregulation and privatisation.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Along with what others have said, a user in another thread pointed out that with a new financial year, they can repeat their performance with their July bill, basically doing whatever they want, so they probably consider it a win all around.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a reasonable question. I don't know how many ICE agents are ok without getting the paycheck.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

DHS considers over 90% of its workers essential. Don't worry ICE will still be paid.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Essential means they have to work, not that they get paid. Once the shutdown is over they get back pay like everyone else.

Ice turning on the administration was not on my bingo card but maybe I should pencil it in real fast

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Should they bet on consequences?