this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
839 points (98.8% liked)
People Twitter
10346 readers
1373 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
- If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
modern einstein is trying to develop new ways to keep people hooked on a social media scroll. modern mozart is producing kpop or playing jazz/fusion in some club where they make $40 a night and then dying broke (like allan holdsworth).
but it's true that most great brains probably never develop properly because the system tries its hardest to keep them stupid and in poverty.
the modern media landscape is all nepo babies and what does it get you? it gets you fuck all; everything is pathetic from top to bottom in every single artform but we're acting like shit is normal.
You got me wanting to go listen to more soffmi muhod, boc, or autechre.
I know, not really the point you were making... but yeah... lets go find more of these mozarts, who, whether still obscure, or found their niche audience, retain their creative integrity, despite the economic pressures. ... Oh that we could each be so. Or that we'd not even need be.
God, remember when actors were expected to be able to dance and sing as well as act?
A bygone age, where polymathy was still more the norm, before the corporation separated us into maximal-bar-one ignorance, of "specialisation",
and (I recently read, in the new book I'm reading) they lopped off the latter half of the expression "jack of all trades, master of none" [something like, "... is more often better than a master of one."],
and they convinced us the specialists were the "experts", the sages of the enlightenment, the wise ones with superior knowledge. ... All the while they're one step away from maximal ignorance.
I wonder how much better acting (and all "professions"/skills) could be, with a broader range of skills beside.