this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
832 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

10346 readers
1357 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bullsworth@pawb.social 32 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

We almost certainly have 1,000 Einsteins and 1,000 Mozarts alive today. A relevant quote from 1979:

"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

-Stephen Jay Gould

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Humans would find a way to destroy space through greed and corruption.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Stories like these from people like these are always delivered through the lens of what's best for business. This is propaganda.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Also lack of genuine self-awareness on their own true intentions. To them, being greedy is so ingrained they can't see it as a hazard to themselves until its too late.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Think about how many Einsteins and Mozarts all over the world who he and the other billionaires have killed through their policies and greed

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago

Well said.

I tried say that too but probably got lost in my verbose rant.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The only reason ghouls like Bezos want a bigger population is because they want more people to exploit, especially artists and scientists.

[–] WizardArtsPropaganda@sh.itjust.works 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most billionaires are the scums of the world, hording the wealth and spending it on stupid stuff while his employees who do the actual work get little to no credit and are payed much less.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Digit@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago

Yeah. If anyone can propose an exception, I will show them an example of effective image whitewashing.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

You know we already probably have a bunch of Mozarts and Einsteins peeing in bottles to avoid getting dinged while driving Amazon Prime trucks because that's the only way they can get by.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're almost certainly is a bunch of geniuses who were never appreciated because they spend their entire lives trying to get food and water because they were unfortunate enough to be born into Ethiopia. We could feed and house and educate these people if we really wanted to, to the benefit of not just themselves, but the entire species if they did turn out to be the next Einstein. Instead the likes of Jeff Bezos go on podcasts and talk about how wonderful the distant future is going to be, while at the same time being utterly unprepared to do anything about the problems we have right now.

Is space Karen actually paid his taxes we probably could build a base on Mars with that money.

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

By that... We all live in Ethiopia. Compared to what could be, without the crooks and their rigged game holding us down

[and telling us they're our saviours, when they let us up for a bit of air, or take credit for making us strong when we manage to struggle for a gasp by ourselves].

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 10 hours ago

That unfortunate reality that their enormous wealth has been mostly down to population growth and psychopathic greed, and not because they were born with magical business brains.

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago

With proper resource management (up to and beyond availing and provisioning all emancipatory technologies), such that we could build vast multi-layered forest arcologyscapes, we could increase the carrying capacity of earth, for humans, to over 300 trillion, living in vast spacious lush garden abundance. Not saying that we should. Just that we could. Such is our headroom.

But we don't get to have nice things, because of the likes of Bezos.

Industrialists, monopolists, "globalists" [oh they love that one, a flowery euphemism for more like "megalomaniacs"?], who eliminate any competition, by whatever means necessary to attain and maintain an imbalance of power.

A few years back I recall some journalists unearthing a study that showed how Wall St (and other stock exchange centers), were not only not "making" money/wealth, but extracting it from the economy, and further, for every dollar of wealth they extracted from the economy, they destroy another 7 dollars of wealth. ... Takes a moment for the magnitude of that to sink in.

So then we get these fauxlanthropists, swanning around, like Rockerfeller, giving a dime to someone on camera, in a community from whom he'd stolen millions, to whitewash their image.

... by whatever means necessary... a lot of that's just by the patents system and the legal system. How many patents get secreted a year? How many merely get sat on? How much lawfare's done to scare off inventors of technologies that would out-compete and obsolete enshitified rent-extraction maximisation technologies? How much else? A spat of inventors disappeared or died in suspicious circumstances recently. How far would you go to protect a multi trillion industry? As far as to actively prevent a better world without resource wars or poverty from ever happening? How far would a psychopath who's drawn to power go, with exacerbating tragedies of the commons for their own selfish short-sighted power-grab and resource gain? There's nothing stopping them...

We can all be polymaths in the making,

not slaves in training, lapping up the platitudes that placate us, from those who enslave us.

(PS, I've been boycotting Amazon since 2004, waiting for everybody else to see it. Maybe now with their participation in vast rampant destruction of rare books to feed their AI for cheap, to become the info monopoly, able to shape our agnosis, more people will see it and stop falling for it, in this small window we have, before their total information management becomes complete and we become a cosmic dystopian tragedy, with our minds entirely curated by the everpresent cold-reading psychopathic ai hypnotist, not just coercively hoodwinking us to carrying it in our pocket, but skynet, will be everywhere, especially in our mind. Except it wont be our mind any more. It will be the corporation's. Maximum capitalisation, reducing people to the numbers. ... Bezos, a trillion humans? Sure. But we are not the same.)

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Did you guys know it's possible to be rich and also just shut the fuck up?

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, we don't see e.g. the heads of the BIS etc swanning around doing the fauxlanthropist whitewashing bit on the podcast circuit.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I haven't heard that term before. Gonna mentally bookmark that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 10 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

modern einstein is trying to develop new ways to keep people hooked on a social media scroll. modern mozart is producing kpop or playing jazz/fusion in some club where they make $40 a night and then dying broke (like allan holdsworth).

but it's true that most great brains probably never develop properly because the system tries its hardest to keep them stupid and in poverty.

the modern media landscape is all nepo babies and what does it get you? it gets you fuck all; everything is pathetic from top to bottom in every single artform but we're acting like shit is normal.

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

You got me wanting to go listen to more soffmi muhod, boc, or autechre.

I know, not really the point you were making... but yeah... lets go find more of these mozarts, who, whether still obscure, or found their niche audience, retain their creative integrity, despite the economic pressures. ... Oh that we could each be so. Or that we'd not even need be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago

He says '1000 Einsteins', but surely thinks '1000 Bezoses' because of course he thinks he's a genius, and because there'll be more new faces in the billionaire paedophilic orgies.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

We already have a 1000 mozarts but half of them are starving right now and then out of the other half 80% couldnt pursue their dreams

[–] skibidi@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.

- Steven Jay Gould

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 8 hours ago

Look some the poors are going to die however that is just the price we all have to pay to make sure the rest of the Epstein Class continues to hoard wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Assuming some aliens appeared out a thin air and gifted us fusion powered spacecraft and space elevator technology it would still take centuries to get to trillions of humans. These people really do talk utter shit.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'm not sure that we ever would. Every country that gets healthcare and a standard of living above abject poverty drops their birthrates. I would hope with fusion power, there wouldn't be a person on (or off) the planet going hungry.

But then again, Jeff Bezos exists, so we'll still end up with 99% of the wealth in the hands of 1%.

[–] Digit@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Yep. Especially if we're all separated in spaceships. Dating's hard enough in the same meat space.

Jesting aside, yup. And space expands faster than we even could fill it. So, at least we're getting billionaires off the idea they need to cull the human population because there's not enough resources here for their squanderous rigged game of manufactured scarcities and coerced dependence on pollution emitting finite resources.

But... Isn't Bezos in the rocket club? "Space is hard", is the idea sold with rockets. We never needed rockets. Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla, and all the less famous innovators of that era, and we can see the start of zero-inertia propulsion had its beginnings on air balloons in the 1800s. Then that's just one step of creating a vessel that can surviva the vacuum of space, and you have a rudimentary space ship. ... From human innovation. But do we get nice things? No. Such tech's secreted, and only used on the wing tips of black stealth fighters to accelerate turns. We could have spaceships for everybody. Even almost a hundred years ago. ... But then other plans were already laid down for us, by the existing power structures, and being followed through. So now we get the likes of Bezos, peddling preposterously implausible placation platitudes, pandering as if he's a good guy, as if he's smart, as if he's a visionary...

... When really it seems like he's the type that does not understand you cannot get 9 women to make a baby in 1 month. But [given Amazon worker treatment] would still keep whipping them harder to try get them to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›