this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
526 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t think this is actually true. Perhaps on some very specific issues but as a whole I’d say no. They are certainly to the right of left wing parties but many conservatives in Europe have also shifted right in recent years.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I've seen leftist Americans say that Bernie Sanders would be considered a right wing conservative in Europe. These people have no idea what the political landscape actually looks like in Europe. Some still believe Europe is a soc-dem Valhalla, because we have healthcare here. But many centrist parties have shifted right in Europe even in the Nordics. For example the center left Danish Social Democrats have implemented hardline asylum policies.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Correct. Most people who say this are focused on healthcare and other social safety net issues. When you look at LGBTQ+ rights, or racial discrimination, or even abortion, Democrats are further to the left of lots of European parties. It can be a slog to get a European to admit they even have racial issues at all.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So obviously I can't speak for all European countries, but I find it hard to see in what way the Dems would not be at least center-right here

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

yeah but center right isn't more right wing than European conservatives. Parties like AfD, PVV, RN, Vlaams Belang are more to the right of European conservatives. Those are straight up fascists. Dems would still be considered liberals in Europe and I mean the old classic liberalism not the weird definition Americans use who think liberalism is a left leaning ideology like progressivism. And liberals are mostly center right to right wing in Europe.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Name a country in Europe where abortion, being gay are illegal or racial discrimination is so bad they have to overcorrect it with laws?

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree look at actual laws and policies, the rural and less educated areas might be loud but they don't hold any power. Stares at Roe v Wade in the US.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Democrats generally support roe v wade so this is a poor example.

The difference is in the US the rural and uneducated people do hold the power.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah they "supported" it so much it was overturned great clown logic.

That also was my point about the dumb dumbs having actual power in the US, so swing and two misses.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I never said they were competent. But I don’t think there’s much question that they genuinely support abortion rights. If you believe otherwise, the ruling of a court with a supermajority controlled by the opposing party is very poor evidence. The Democratic appointees all voted to preserve it.

[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's worse than that, in my opinion. The Dems feign incompetence to keep the game of distraction going. It's like WWE to keep us all blaming our neighbors while they take away more of our rights a little at a time. They let Rowe v. Wade get overturned on purpose so they have something to harp about in the future.

Obama suspended habeus corpus which goes back to the frigging Magna Carta: all they need to do is call you a terrorist or a traitor and they can just disappear your ass. Rhetorical side note: how can Julian Assange have committed treason if he wasn't an American to begin with?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

Maybe in a few specific issues this happens but I think it’s more that dems face a lot of pressure for powerful people and they tend to buckle.

I don’t see any evidence of that with roe vs wade. They just didn’t think it would be overturned.

Are you talking about Guantanamo Bay with the Habeus Corpus stuff?