this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
934 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

26691 readers
2031 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not better. Between two banks block chain adds nothing. Either side could alter it just as easily as they could alter a regular transmission, and more easily than they could for a signed encrypted transmission

You need many nodes to make block chain immutable

You only need a sender and receiver to make signed data packets immutable

[โ€“] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You've misunderstood. They're not using this for inter-bank transfers. They're using it for inter-branch/intra-bank communication. And most major banks - certainly the ones investing in blockchain - have hundreds to thousands of branches.

Not to mention signing+encryption and blockchain are not mutually exclusive. You can have signed and encrypted blocks on a chain