this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
842 points (96.8% liked)
Technology
87624 readers
4231 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hope this takes off and people start using "tweet" and "twitter" again and it makes "x" completely irrelevant like his Hitler salute should have
Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I'm out
Well, they need something to pay the lawyers with once Musk takes notice.
Edit: I've just discovered this interesting concept called "reading the article" and found out that they've already been sued, though it's still not entirely settled.
Spread the word my brother! You've got to let everyone know about this new fad!
I read it but honestly, probably 80% of the time I do not. Because articles are very often full of pop ups and ads and tracking and paywalls, and are unnecessarily verbose (most can be summarized in 1-2 sentences), and are just republishing someone else's work while adding nothing, and simultaneously devoid of useful information or any actual sources.
Some of that can be solved with Firefox and unblock.
100% can be solved by knowingly making a glaringly obviously false claim about the topic and someone will correct you in a dickish tone while citing the article
Your grandad's AI summary, if you will.
I've seen AI summaries that looked like the AI had not read the article.
In fairness, that could be said of some of the know-it-all summaries as well. 😅
Works for me 😏
What dark magic is this
This is liberal propaganda FAKE NEWS
Jokes aside: I think it's great that you read the article, then went back to both acknowledge that it covered your point and admit that you didn't before.
Wait. Is that allowed?
How do I learn this power?
This here is an excellent guide:
https://twitter.now/
vibe coded slop asking for $20 bucks to sign up.. i think I'm okay
Oh fuck this is embarrassing
That site was blocked by spectrum when I tried it
Lol
Probably a pre-emptive block to stop scam sites from using domain that are similar.
I don't think I've ever seen that many em dashes ever. Not even in the most copy/paste AI slop wall of text. Holy moly.
Wow you were not kidding. Some of them are extra awkward and unnatural too, it's almost a parody of what slop text looks like.
Yep, I can't spend the money now, which is probably true for a lot of people, and I'm definitely gonna forget this is a thing by the time it's free or I have the money, which is probably true for a lot of people.
They probably need the money to pay for their AI-based "fact-checking":
Using a technology that's known for making shit up, for fact-checking, is so dumb, but it will probably bring in investors because AI.
Do they expect everything posted to be just news and information that can be fact-checked? Is this AI going to fact-check my opinions and shitposts too?
The homepage feels like AI slop too.
"I just watched movie. It sucked!"
"Beep boop. According to trustworthy, verifiable sources, movie does not suck. Sanction : immediate ban."
AI is very good at classification
Every tweet
Poop emoji - this has been fact checked but can not be independently verified due to lack of context
...As a "founder"; we'll see how long that lasts
but til then at least, I'm out too
Shit, that's twice as much as it used to cost to join Something Awful, and I bet you don't even get access to furry porno.
I'd still be hesitant if they paid me 20$ to join.
Sounds like a grift.
I never stopped
No one else did either
I called it X-twitter. I didn't really use "tweet" though; mostly because I tend to talk about toots more than tweets.
I tend to talk about my toots after I eat a can of spicy chili beans right out the can
Are we sure it’s not mostly still bots on Twitter? I deleted my account back then and have not been back.
At least, not willingly back, since some people still hyperlink to Twitter directly rather than just sharing screenshots of whatever the content was. So you click the text hyperlink thinking it’s to a web article, only for it to bring you to some random string of tweets visibly displayed in the least logical order.
Oh I'm positive it's mainly bots and morons on x
what what term do people use for tweets on shitter now? just "posts"?
x-crete
Xhit
Tweets