this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
316 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30954 readers
2279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Idiots who have no critical thinking skills in charge of education folks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Three possibilities :

  • the DOE staff is Nazi;
  • the DOE is uneducated, which is kind of ironic;
  • both.

None of these possibilities looks good.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

They are fascist. Fascists share common traits, so they think in similar ways as Nazis. They didn't realize in the movie clip Churchill was frustrated that people thought they should negotiate with a bully (Hitler), they assumed the bully he was talking about must be some awesome guy because bullies are awesome. They not only missed the context that it was Hitler he was talking about, they also missed the fact that Churchill was arguing against negotiating with Hitler and that they should fight him instead. And also there the fact that Hitler ultimately lost.

So understanding the context, the message was "don't negotiate with Trump, fight against instead, he will eventually lose if you fight him." I actually agree with that message.

BTW, DOE is Department of Energy. Education Department is usually abbreviated with ED.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK so I'm probably borrowing from the Alt-Right Playbook here, but it's been long enough that I don't remember which ones. The wink-wink, nudge-nudge references to nazi catchphrases and imagery are deliberate. They serve three key purposes:

  1. They let the nazis know that they are seen and valued by the administration. This is critical, because Trump's success has depended upon keeping extremists happy rather than appealing directly to neoconservatives.

  2. The neocons like the message but will usually miss the references. They will get angry when the nazi undertones are exposed, because they feel they are being called nazis for agreeing with what they see as standard conservatism.

  3. It "triggers the libs," which everyone still seems to think is hilarious.

All of which is irrelevant, because there is no useful distinction between nazis and people who participate in nazism because it advances their agenda.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Im white and Ive been around other whites who will casually drop the n word. To see how I react. Or will say something blatantly racist even without the nword.

For example I was viewing a rental property and the landlord said something like "you don't have to worry about the darkies , there ain't any around here except a few blocks over and they don't bother nobody".

At first I didn't know wtf he was talking about. Warlocks?

I also was only half listening as I had noticed how shitty the place was and already decided no.

Racist landlord was just cherry on top.

Anywho.

I swear it's a way for them to find each other.

They also seem to assume that since I'm white I'm with them on being racist. Or at the very least don't mind that kind of talk.

I've only had a few of these encounters in my life. It's not something I experience often. So it always catches me off guard.

But my buddy who is a mechanic, white, interacts with the public a lot more. He says it happens to him a lot more. Like they assume they are in the company of similar minds.

Nope.

My point being that. Yes I agree. It's advertising to find similar types of people. To tell them they are welcome. And to promote it as normal.

It's done on a big scale but happens a lot on an individual level too.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Agree, it's a secret handshake. Then you know you can put the MyPillowCase with eyeholes over your head.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago

I think both is the default assumption with Trump appointees.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

You gotta understand that the Party wants the change history. Every day they try to rewrite it to match their ever changing narrative. When Big Brother trump writes on his (Ministry of) Truth social account, he really tries to spread the propaganda and be the world ruler.