this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
506 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I now know I am OFFICIALLY on some sort of watchlist! Yippee!

The list is supposedly not exhaustive, but I recommend everyone to search your plate to see if you’ve been tracked. I worry for the safety of the women who have been searched more than 50 times by the same user.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To who, and for what? At least conspiracy theories used to make sense

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you think the government is the only organization using your data against you friend, you're living in a different era. Insurance companies, banks, ad farms, private security, AI tech giants, etc., etc., ad nauseum are all using your public and private profile to shape every second of every day. Testing your limits, tracking your movements, mapping your relationships, your buying patterns, and making you dance like a puppet for their entertainment.

The government is the least scary of the groups shaping your world, because at least there's hypothetically an accountability mechanism in the democratic process. Public, private, it really makes little difference, if you trust any of them without question, you're playing yourself

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's the business case here for this example?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm skeptical, but to play devil's advocate: I guess it could help a data broker that had some information attached to a license plate number, perhaps including your identity. When you enter your license plate number into this web search, they can associate the IP address and browser fingerprint of the request with the license plate and therefore with your identity and any other data in the first database. This enables them to connect your identity and your vehicle to whatever online activity data they have for that IP address and/or browser fingerprint.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

The obvious example is how Facebook tracks your physical location and nearby devices to determine what ads to serve you. That's often why people think Facebook is listening to them and serving them ads for things they mentioned in casual conversation but haven't searched for themselves. They didn't search for it, but their friend did, and they know if you get an ad for that thing you're more likely to click through based on potential word-of-mouth effects. They're using your IRL social network and physical location as an extension of their ad algorithm.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To sell you something or control you.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How would a company knowing your license plate number help with that. I don’t want them to have it (or anything else), but I legitimately cannot think of a use case

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To sell to other companies so they can compare your data on various sources.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

..what could your license plate number even be used for

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell me your license plate number and the state/province and I’ll tell you a lot about you.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

OK, SMU-248 MN. You’ll be able to find out its make and model, that’s it, unless you work for law enforcement or an insurance agency. If you’re able to find out my name from it, tell it to me, but it’s literally impossible/illegal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver%27s_Privacy_Protection_Act

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But remember they'd also have your IP address, which could be linked to a lot of other data. It's not that IP address + license plate is useful in itself, but that a connection is now made that could be valuable to a data broker who already has other information connected to one or both sides. And even if you fake your IP address, there's browser fingerprinting.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I should have specified I need a photo of it to be sure you’re not making it up 🥰

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, because then you could use the metadata in the picture to find out where I took it, I’m not stupid. Tell me the name or the address of who has that plate.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So remove the metadata or better yet, turn off location tagging entirely.

Don’t make excuses.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Couple things - first, these ‘data brokers’ wouldn’t be getting a picture of the plate if you searched it up on the database, just the plate number. Second, why would having a picture of it even help lol. It would just be the verifying it’s my plate and I already gave you the plate number, explain it first before I even bother.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No this is because I know you’re not giving me a real plate. You want a goose chase and I want to show you how easy it is.

When you decide to stop lying, come back.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

lol thanks for admitting you’re full of shit. If you type in a plate on this website, it’ll tell you if it’s real or not, it even tells you the make and model for free. Try looking up a fake plate and you’ll see it says ‘no results found’

https://www.jdpower.com/cars/license-plate-lookup-and-decoder

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve admitted nothing. Wow, I think you need to read slower.

I KNOW YOU GAVE ME A FAKE PLATE.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally just type it into that website.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I literally know you’re lying because you’re running around like a headless chicken trying to come up with responses that will get you out of this… but everyone can see how full of shit you are.

Show me a photo of your Michigan license plate (smu248). Otherwise you are lying and we should just stop talking.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yikes sorry I correctly called you out for making shit up and now you’re lashing out. Also, ‘MN’ is the abbreviation for Minnesota, not Michigan lol

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’m not lashing out, yes it’s funny that I mistook took it for Michigan.

I’m still waiting for that photo, liar.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I know I should stop replying but I know you’re getting mad/embarrassed so I’ll keep going. OK, say it’s not my plate, I picked it from a random car in the parking lot. Who owns it? Just gimme their first name.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sweetie, why would I be embarrassed? You’re the one lying in public. I would be more than happy to go back to where I tell you who you are based on your license plate.

Thank you for admitting, somewhat, that you did lie and that that was not your plate.

If you think it would be appropriate to put someone else’s license plate on the Internet in a conversation where a person is saying they can identify them, then sure, show me your neighbor’s license plate.

Or, just admit that you’re too scared to give your real plate because you know there’s actually a chance I can tell you the information.

[–] iluvlamp37@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know that if I took a picture of it you could be saying the same exact thing, that there’s no proof I own it and I just took a picture of a car in a parking lot.

Please keep going and let me point out more holes in your logic

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Yawn. Keep making excuses.