this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
481 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87806 readers
3522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 85 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Copyright is conveniently only flexible for multibillion dollar AI firms.

If anyone ever does try to argue this in court, they'll just change the justification to "national security."

We need the most powerful AI we can make because our rival nations are building their most powerful AIs. Our rivals are using their AI to control drone swarms, perform automated intelligence-gathering, do mass automated hacking, and perform influence operations. Wars are quickly devolving into battles of drone swarms vs drone swarms, and the limit is on the people needed to control the. Our rivals are revolutionizing their supply chains with AI. They may even be performing vast automated influence operations designed to target individual citizens. In the near future, if you're an American citizen, the Chinese government will know who you are personally, have a file on you, and will be using AI to try and psychologically manipulate you. We need to be able to fight this! We simply have no choice but to keep up. National security demands it. Companies participating in national security-crucial AI development will be exempt from copyright laws.

I'm no lawyer, but a law to allow this almost certainly already exists. US law is full of national security exemptions. For example, I'm pretty sure in wartime IP laws can be waived. If you've invented some amazing new technology with military applications? If the government comes knocking and you just refuse to sell to them or demand a completely impossible price, there has to be a mechanism in IP law for those rights to simply be waived, or the rights taken by a form of eminent domain. There's probably some provision of copyright law that would allow a president to void certain copyrights in a national security emergency.

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course… But it might be fun to test the theory.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Next time they send a cease and desist letter to some website hosting copyrighted content the website should just say they're using the content to train AI models.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Good effort. You have been deemed a threat to 'National Security'! Only the biggest ai firms get to do that.

[–] PostaL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Flexible? That's a really wrong way to spell "inexistent" ...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

"I was working on a MR. For America."