this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
656 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

87878 readers
2665 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What was the innovation in the iPhone?

It was worse in almost every way except marketing than the n900.

The technology had reached the point where you could have smartphones by then, I don't see what was innovative about iPhones.

You can call it visionary, sure because he spread his vision for a locked down phone, but where is the innovation in the iPhone?

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

the n900 was released two years after the iphone. it was modeled on the iphone from the start, like the entire industry was. (and the n900 still didn’t support multi-touch, which Apple patented.)

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The n900 was an interation in the n800, but sure how that can be modeled on the iPhone without time travel.

Is the iPhones invocation patenting things?

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

the n900’s changes to the n800 were modeled on the iPhone. the n800 is completely different: for one, the touch screen is activated by pressure, not touch. Are you arguing that the n800 is better than the iPhone 1?

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No I'm pointing out that the n900 with it's full keyboard was not modeled of the iPhone.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

every new phone back then was actually new. the ideas for n900 (and all its radical changes, radical as in for the n800 not for the industry) were clearly about the iphone. i’ll agree that the n800 was not.