this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

61978 readers
789 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello!

Regarding what Gamers Nexus recently disclosed regarding LG TVs in their latest video I think its finally time to do what I can to mitigate it.

I cant root it since the firmware is too new and I cant afford a new TV either. My best bet would be blocking all LG IPs network-wide and disconnecting it from the network. (Although I understand even that might not be enough, its the best I can do right now)

I was thinking of using an old Raspberry to atleast access youtube and my media server, however I dont know what would be a good OS/distro to run this on. Preferably I would want to use something like an old PS4 controller as the remote.

Anyone here who has any suggestions or living room setups to suggest? Any and all tips are welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Not a popular answer, but Apple TV is the best out of the box experience. Zero ads, massive longevity. Mine is like 7 years old and still running the latest tvOS.

If you have the cash and inclination, Nvidia Shield is the hackers choice. Zero hardware upgrades in years tho, but software aplenty.

Just don’t let your smart TV access the internet in any situation, there’s no need. It’s just a stupid display.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Zero ads

The launcher is a massive ad for Apple's services though.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

What? There’s one icon that says “TV”. You can move it to the bottom and you won’t see any apple stuff beyond that.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Apple TV's launcher was recently "updated" to showcase whatever latest content is being pushed through Apple's own services. Which is advertisement.

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Are apple TVs not phoning home?

If anything I'd imagine they're one of the hardest companies to block, considering most apple users have a thousand idevices that could smuggle messages, even with all communications turned off.

[–] Drun@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

“Find My” network is pretty strict by its nature, if you’re talking about that. Realistically speaking, I wouldn’t be scared of it, because I can’t see any vector from which it can be dangerous to the end user.

Nonetheless, “Find My” is an optional feature and can be fully disabled. Other Apple web-services can be blocked on a network level, if you want it for some reason. But, IMO, at this paranoia level, the only right option is OSS with a strict firewall.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not at this scale. Remember that Apple is a hardware company first. They make money from hardware and app stores.

Google is the worlds largest ad company who dabble in hardware and services to increase their ad revenue.

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They're still a public company, and Im sure the heat is on their C suite cause they haven't had any successful hardware releases since the M series processor was first released.

Not selling "anonymous" data would look to shareholders as thrown away profit, which they're even able to sue for.

So I'd be insanely surprised if they weren't surveiling their users - but unlike google and all, they own their entire closed-source software and hardware empire, so the likelihood of catching them is also valuably low.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Just to check, would Apple's commitment to DEI policies look as thrown-away profit to shareholders?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And Google spyware is all open source?

[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

People do pick up Pixel phones to install GrapheneOS on. How many people pick up Apple phones/tablets and are able to install another OS on it and have it as functional as GrapheneOS?

Same with smartwatches which from the Android side can be used offline with apps like Gadgetbridge to retrieve data without giving your watch internet access and not using the official apps.

Apple is very account and OS centric wanting to funnel everything through them. Exception has been MacOS devices which has had better luck with stuff like Asahi Linux.

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Google's just using linux for its price, but the GPL of AOSP does a lot of heavy lifting for reverse engineering efforts like this.

edit: not that that matters at all to apple spying on users - like them scanning all Iclouds openly wasn't even that long ago